These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21681900)

  • 1. Transaortic flow velocity from dual-source MDCT for the diagnosis of aortic stenosis severity.
    Schultz CJ; Papadopoulou SL; Moelker A; Nuis RJ; Ten Kate GJ; Mollet NR; Geleijnse ML; de Feyter P; de Jaegere P; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):127-35. PubMed ID: 21681900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis.
    De Vecchi C; Caudron J; Dubourg B; Pirot N; Lefebvre V; Bauer F; Eltchaninoff H; Dacher JN
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24582043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B; Schoenhagen P; Kapadia SR; Svensson LG; Rodriguez L; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detector computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Larsen LH; Kofoed KF; Carstensen HG; Mejdahl MR; Andersen MJ; Kjaergaard J; Nielsen OW; Køber L; Møgelvang R; Hassager C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 30(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 24126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of multi-detector computed tomography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Larsen LH; Kofoed KF; Carstensen HG; Dalsgaard M; Ersbøll MK; Køber L; Hassager C
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 203():331-7. PubMed ID: 26529082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve area calculation in aortic stenosis by CT and Doppler echocardiography.
    Clavel MA; Malouf J; Messika-Zeitoun D; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Enriquez-Sarano M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):248-257. PubMed ID: 25772832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of aortic valve leaflet calcification on dynamic aortic valve motion assessed by cardiac computed tomography.
    Minami K; Yoneyama K; Izumo M; Suzuki K; Ogawa Y; Chikaraishi K; Ogawa Y; Kobayashi Y; Furukawa T; Tanabe Y; Akashi YJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(6):485-490. PubMed ID: 27597530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility and accuracy of three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography vs. multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of aortic valve annulus in patient candidates to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Tamborini G; Fusini L; Muratori M; Cefalù C; Gripari P; Ali SG; Pontone G; Andreini D; Bartorelli AL; Alamanni F; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 15(12):1316-23. PubMed ID: 25187619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified continuity equation using left ventricular outflow tract three-dimensional imaging for aortic valve area estimation.
    Pinto Teixeira P; Ramos R; Rio P; Moura Branco L; Portugal G; Abreu A; Galrinho A; Marques H; Figueiredo L; Cruz Ferreira R
    Echocardiography; 2017 Jul; 34(7):978-985. PubMed ID: 28589708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of pressure recovery on echocardiographic assessment of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a SEAS substudy.
    Bahlmann E; Cramariuc D; Gerdts E; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Nienaber CA; Eriksen E; Wachtell K; Chambers J; Kuck KH; Ray S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 20541709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination.
    Anger T; Bauer V; Plachtzik C; Geisler T; Gawaz MP; Oberhoff M; Höher M
    J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 24060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiography.
    Tanaka H; Shimada K; Yoshida K; Jissho S; Yoshikawa J; Yoshiyama M
    Circ J; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1593-8. PubMed ID: 17895557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomic estimation of aortic stenosis severity vs "fusion" of data from computed tomography and Doppler echocardiography.
    Jander N; Wienecke S; Dorfs S; Ruile P; Neumann FJ; Pache G; Minners J
    Echocardiography; 2018 Jun; 35(6):777-784. PubMed ID: 29522643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invasive assessment of doubtful aortic stenosis by measuring simultaneous transaortic gradient with a pressure wire.
    Chopard R; Meneveau N; Plastaras P; Janin S; Seronde MF; Ecarnot F; Schiele F
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 111(12):1772-7. PubMed ID: 23540549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resting Aortic Valve Area at Normal Transaortic Flow Rate Reflects True Valve Area in Suspected Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Chahal NS; Drakopoulou M; Gonzalez-Gonzalez AM; Manivarmane R; Khattar R; Senior R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):1133-1139. PubMed ID: 26363832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.