These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682223)

  • 1. Healthcare rationing. Decision time.
    Moore A
    Health Serv J; 2011 May; 121(6255):22-3. PubMed ID: 21682223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.
    Holm S
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7164):1000-2. PubMed ID: 9841021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethics, institutional complexity and health care reform: the struggle for normative balance.
    Graetz MJ; Mashaw JL
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994; 10():93-104. PubMed ID: 10134818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AHRQ's free research can help plans anticipate coverage issues.
    Roberts DC; Schoelles K
    Manag Care; 2013 Oct; 22(10):41-4. PubMed ID: 24344527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality-adjusted life years: cost-effective medical decision-making.
    Turner S
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1997; 8(4):34-9. PubMed ID: 10169748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology assessment and the doctor-patient relationship.
    Wax AL
    Va Law Rev; 1996 Nov; 82(8):1641-62. PubMed ID: 16715567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.
    Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Apr; 11(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11921316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economics, QALYs and medical ethics--a health economist's perspective.
    Williams A
    Health Care Anal; 1995 Aug; 3(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10151641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis: misguided guidelines?
    Naylor CD; Williams JI; Basinski A; Goel V
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):921-4. PubMed ID: 8448706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of health care: what can we learn from Oregon?
    Street A; Richardson J
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 10119044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritizing surgical waiting lists.
    Testi A; Tanfani E; Valente R; Ansaldo GL; Torre GC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Feb; 14(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18211645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflections on science, judgment, and value in evidence-based decision making: a conversation with David Eddy by Sean R. Tunis.
    Eddy D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):w500-15. PubMed ID: 17580317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.
    Marsh K; IJzerman M; Thokala P; Baltussen R; Boysen M; Kaló Z; Lönngren T; Mussen F; Peacock S; Watkins J; Devlin N;
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 27021745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritization of congenital cardiac surgical patients using fuzzy reasoning--a solution to the problem of the waiting list?
    Holzer R; Ladusans E; Kitchiner D; Peart I; Gladman G; Miles G
    Cardiol Young; 2006 Jun; 16(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 16725069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Waiting lists--why do they arise, and what can be done about them?].
    Kjellberg J; Søgaard J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Nov; 166(47):4237-40. PubMed ID: 15587351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [QALY--quality-adjusted life years--a controversial method for prioritization in health care].
    Andréasson S; Calltorp J
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Apr; 89(18):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1579026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Priorities in health care: what can we learn from the "Oregon Health Plan"?].
    Marckmann G; Siebert U
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Jul; 127(30):1601-4. PubMed ID: 12143017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A determination of topics for health technology assessment in Thailand: making decision makers involved.
    Lertpitakpong C; Chaikledkaew U; Thavorncharoensap M; Tantivess S; Praditsitthikorn N; Youngkong S; Yothasamut J; Udomsuk K; Sinthitichai K; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S100-9. PubMed ID: 19253492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Freedom, fault and default.
    Friedman E
    Health Manage Q; 1992; 14(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 10119352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.