These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682392)

  • 1. Characterization of a fiber-optic displacement sensor for measurements in high-intensity focused ultrasound fields.
    Haller J; Wilkens V; Jenderka KV; Koch C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3676-81. PubMed ID: 21682392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.
    Morris P; Hurrell A; Shaw A; Zhang E; Beard P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3611-22. PubMed ID: 19507943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling transducer impulse responses for predicting calibrated pressure pulses with the ultrasound simulation program Field II.
    Bæk D; Jensen JA; Willatzen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2825-35. PubMed ID: 21117733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic Doppler velocity measurement system using capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer array technology.
    Shin M; Krause JS; DeBitetto P; White RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1011-20. PubMed ID: 23927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of pressure-velocity probes using a progressive plane wave reference field and comparison with nominal calibration filters.
    Stanzial D; Sacchi G; Schiffrer G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3745-55. PubMed ID: 21682398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical framework for quantitatively estimating ultrasound beam intensities using infrared thermography.
    Myers MR; Giridhar D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4073-83. PubMed ID: 21682428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct methods for characterizing high-intensity focused ultrasound transducers using acoustic streaming.
    Myers MR; Hariharan P; Banerjee RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1790-802. PubMed ID: 19045669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional computer-controlled acoustic pressure scanning and quantification of focused ultrasound.
    Seo J; Koizumi N; Yoshinaka K; Sugita N; Nomiya A; Homma Y; Matsumoto Y; Mitsuishi M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Apr; 57(4):883-91. PubMed ID: 20378450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acousto-optic, point receiver hydrophone probe for operation up to 100 MHz.
    Lewin PA; Mu C; Umchid S; Daryoush A; El-Sherif M
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Dec; 43(10):815-21. PubMed ID: 16054665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the lateral resolution of focused ultrasonic fields from spherically curved transducers.
    Beissner K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3943-7. PubMed ID: 24180803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum radiation force target size for power measurements in focused ultrasonic fields with circular symmetry.
    Beissner K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3355-62. PubMed ID: 21218869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of three hydrophones and a numerical model in high intensity focused ultrasound fields.
    Haller J; Jenderka KV; Durando G; Shaw A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1121-30. PubMed ID: 22352487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compact directional acoustic sensor using a multi-fiber optical probe.
    Bucaro JA; Lagakos N; Houston BH; Dey S; Zalalutdinov M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):832-41. PubMed ID: 23363102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods to calibrate the absolute receive sensitivity of single-element, focused transducers.
    Rich KT; Mast TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL193-8. PubMed ID: 26428812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Altman MB; Partanen A; Wan L; Gach HM; Straube W; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 28626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of acoustic intensity in the focused ultrasound field using hydrophone and infrared imaging.
    Yu Y; Shen G; Zhou Y; Bai J; Chen Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):2021-33. PubMed ID: 23972377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A targeting method based on acoustic backscatter for treatment planning in tissue ablation using focused ultrasound.
    Zheng X; Vaezy S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jan; 57(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19605311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure compensated fiber laser hydrophone: modeling and experimentation.
    Chandrika UK; Pallayil V; Lim KM; Chew CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2710-8. PubMed ID: 24116409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and performance evaluation of a broadband three dimensional acoustic intensity measuring system.
    Miah KH; Hixon EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2338-46. PubMed ID: 20370016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound.
    Zheng X; Vaezy S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):610-22. PubMed ID: 20211516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.