These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682395)

  • 1. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
    Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
    Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation].
    Matschke RG
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.
    Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 511652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.