142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682419)
1. Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.
Kates JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3981-90. PubMed ID: 21682419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal-envelope constancy of speech in rooms and the perceptual weighting of frequency bands.
Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2777-88. PubMed ID: 22087906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Ganapathy S; Thomas S; Hermansky H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3769-80. PubMed ID: 21218908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandarin speech-in-noise and tone recognition using vocoder simulations of the temporal limits encoder for cochlear implants.
Meng Q; Zheng N; Li X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):301-10. PubMed ID: 26827026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children.
Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Lorenzi C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system.
Shamma S; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2818-33. PubMed ID: 23654388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling.
Tsilfidis A; Mourjopoulos J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1439-51. PubMed ID: 21428508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of spectral and temporal cues in restoring missing speech information.
Gilbert G; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):EL294-9. PubMed ID: 21110541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selectivity of modulation interference for consonant identification in normal-hearing listeners.
Apoux F; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1665-72. PubMed ID: 18345854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic formant tracking of noisy speech using temporal analysis on outputs from a nonlinear cochlear model.
Deng L; Kheirallah I
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 May; 40(5):456-67. PubMed ID: 8225334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]