119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682423)
1. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4023-36. PubMed ID: 21682423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing.
Laback B; Zimmermann I; Majdak P; Baumgartner WD; Pok SM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1515-29. PubMed ID: 21895091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.
Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences of the use of FOX, an intelligent agent, for programming cochlear implant sound processors in new users.
Vaerenberg B; Govaerts PJ; de Ceulaer G; Daemers K; Schauwers K
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 21091083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrical field imaging as a means to predict the loudness of monopolar and tripolar stimuli in cochlear implant patients.
Berenstein CK; Vanpoucke FJ; Mulder JJ; Mens LH
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):28-38. PubMed ID: 20946945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation.
Fredelake S; Hohmann V
Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):76-90. PubMed ID: 22465681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):465-74. PubMed ID: 22315988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.
Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T; Hudson M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 21599615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
