BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21682545)

  • 1. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
    Keintz C
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Keintz CK; Bunton K; Hoit JD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2007 Aug; 16(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17666548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Patel R; Usher N; Kember H; Russell S; Laures-Gore J
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():13-8. PubMed ID: 25113966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual speech improves the intelligibility of time-expanded auditory speech.
    Tanaka A; Sakamoto S; Tsumura K; Suzuki Y
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19240661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech synthesis in background noise: effects of message formulation and visual information on the intelligibility of American English DECTalk.
    Drager KD; Anderson JL; Debarros J; Hayes E; Liebman J; Panek E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Jun; 23(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17487630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners.
    Cohen JI; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):EL470. PubMed ID: 28599569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Dysarthria Type, Speaking Condition, and Listener Age on Speech Intelligibility.
    McAuliffe MJ; Fletcher AR; Kerr SE; O'Beirne GA; Anderson T
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Feb; 26(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 28124068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria.
    Hustad KC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 51(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 18506035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of speech cues in French-speaking children with dysarthria.
    Levy ES; Moya-Galé G; Chang YM; Campanelli L; MacLeod AAN; Escorial S; Maillart C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 May; 55(3):401-416. PubMed ID: 32077196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.