438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21683336)
1. Femtosecond sub-bowman keratomileusis: a prospective, long-term, intereye comparison of safety and outcomes of 90- versus 100-μm flaps.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Kumar DA; Chari M; Agarwal A; Jacob S; Srivastava D
Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 152(4):582-590.e2. PubMed ID: 21683336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal comparison of outcomes after sub-Bowman keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis: randomized, double-masked study.
Wong RC; Yu M; Chan TC; Chong KK; Jhanji V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 159(5):835-45.e3. PubMed ID: 25681001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized comparison of four femtosecond LASIK flap thicknesses.
Prakash G; Agarwal A; Yadav A; Jacob S; Kumar DA; Agarwal A; Akhtar R
J Refract Surg; 2010 Jun; 26(6):392-402. PubMed ID: 20677726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.
Slade SG; Durrie DS; Binder PS
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1075-82. PubMed ID: 19486798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.
Steinert RF; Hersh PS
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Gil-Cazorla R; Drake P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 148(6):830-6.e1. PubMed ID: 19781686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap.
Beerthuizen JJ; Siebelt E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17662427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A contralateral, randomized comparison of optimized prolate ablation and conventional LASIK for myopia with the NIDEK excimer laser platform.
El Danasoury AM; Holladay J; Waring GO; Pieger S; Bains HS
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):453-61. PubMed ID: 22767164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thresholds for interface haze formation after thin-flap femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Rocha KM; Kagan R; Smith SD; Krueger RR
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):966-72, 972.e1. PubMed ID: 19327748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for consecutive hyperopia after radial keratotomy.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF; Javaloy J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1183-9. PubMed ID: 17586373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retreatment after wavefront-guided and standard myopic LASIK.
Jin GJ; Merkley KH
Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16828506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the treatment of high myopia by using the CustomVue wavefront platform.
Kulkamthorn T; Silao JN; Torres LF; Lim JN; Purcell TL; Tantayakom T; Schanzlin DJ
Cornea; 2008 Aug; 27(7):787-90. PubMed ID: 18650664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual outcomes after Epi-LASIK and PRK for low and moderate myopia.
Sia RK; Coe CD; Edwards JD; Ryan DS; Bower KS
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 21985667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective, contralateral comparison of 120-μm and 90-μm LASIK flaps using the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser.
Moshirfar M; Hatch BB; Chang JC; Kurz CJ; Eugarrios MF; Mifflin MD
J Refract Surg; 2011 Apr; 27(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 20672771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
