These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21683511)

  • 1. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ; Gorny KR; King DM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1350-7. PubMed ID: 21683511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment.
    Balbis S; Meloni T; Tofani S; Zenone F; Nucera D; Guiot C
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 22359401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a low-cost liquid ultrasound test object for detection of transducer artefacts.
    King DM; Hangiandreou NJ; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):N557-70. PubMed ID: 21081828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance.
    Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control.
    Gorny KR; Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2615-28. PubMed ID: 16193792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners.
    Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient.
    Mårtensson M; Olsson M; Brodin LÅ
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Oct; 11(9):801-5. PubMed ID: 20530601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and implementation of a quality control protocol for B-mode ultrasound equipment.
    Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Triantopoulou SS; Triantopoulou C
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Jun; 25(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 33834366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The resolution integral: visual and computational approaches to characterizing ultrasound images.
    MacGillivray TJ; Ellis W; Pye SD
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5067-88. PubMed ID: 20702928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner.
    Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A possible quality control protocol for Doppler ultrasound for organizational time optimization.
    Di Nallo AM; Strigari L; Benassi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Sep; 25(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 17167978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging.
    Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Method of Correcting for the Effect of Temperature on Low-Contrast Penetration Measurement in Urethane Phantoms.
    Peake E; Warrington S; Dudley NJ; Morgan PS; Gibson NM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1483-1488. PubMed ID: 30967319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control of ultrasound transducers: analysis of evaluation parameters and results of a survey of 116 transducers in a single hospital.
    Cozzolino P; Stramare R; Udilano A; Castoro M; Scagliori E; Beltrame V; Rubaltelli L
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):668-77. PubMed ID: 20177978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective measurements of image quality.
    Browne JE; Watson AJ; Gibson NM; Dudley NJ; Elliott AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 14998675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.