These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21683511)

  • 21. Simple uniformity and penetration phantoms for the quality assurance of ultrasound scanners.
    Groth MJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 7872901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An ultrasonic device for source to skin surface distance measurement in patient setup.
    Feng Y; Allison R; Hu XH; Mota H; Jenkins T; Wolfe ML; Sibata C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1587-9. PubMed ID: 15817366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality assurance in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma using a standardized phantom and standard clinical images: a 3-year national investigation in Korea.
    Choi JI; Jung SE; Kim PN; Cha SH; Jun JK; Lee HY; Park EC
    J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):985-95. PubMed ID: 24866605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of extended field of view and dual image ultrasound techniques: accuracy and reliability of distance measurements in phantom study.
    Ying M; Sin MH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15653233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Imaging Parameters of Ultrasound Scanners: Baseline for Future Testing.
    Fabiszewska E; Pasicz K; Grabska I; Skrzyński W; Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W; Bulski W
    Pol J Radiol; 2017; 82():773-782. PubMed ID: 29657644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multimode ultrasound breast imaging using a new array transducer configuration.
    Jeong MK; Kwon SJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 20350688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transducer hygiene -- an underrated topic?
    Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2005 Feb; 26(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15700221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of a multi frequency pulse diagnostic ultrasound device.
    Goodenough TI; Rajendram VS; Meyer S; Prêtre D
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Jan; 43(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 15556651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
    Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
    Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
    Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of acoustic velocity on phantom measurements.
    Goldstein A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 26(7):1133-43. PubMed ID: 11053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Results of a study of quality control of diagnostic ultrasound equipment].
    Kollmann C
    Ultraschall Med; 1995 Oct; 16(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 8533069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical control of the quality of dynamic echography].
    Bazzocchi M; Ricci C; Gozzi G; Pozzi Mucelli RS
    Radiol Med; 1985 Mar; 71(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 3898240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Results of measurement of resolution capability of ultrasonographic equipment using our new method].
    Dolezal L; Hálek J; Smolan S
    Sb Lek; 1998; 99(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 10803287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sonographic transducer performance cannot be evaluated with clinical images.
    Jaffe CC; Harris DJ; Taylor KJ; Viscomi G; Mannes E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Dec; 137(6):1239-43. PubMed ID: 6976099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response.
    Rowland DE; Newey VR; Turner DP; Nassiri DK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1525-34. PubMed ID: 19560252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temperature mapping near the surface of ultrasound transducers using susceptibility- compensated magnetic resonance imaging.
    Webb AG; Neuberger T; Park EJ; Smith N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 19574122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.