These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21684165)

  • 1. Energy cost of walking in transfemoral amputees: Comparison between Marlo Anatomical Socket and Ischial Containment Socket.
    Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Paradisi F; Brunelli S
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jun; 34(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 21684165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees walking on a horizontal and tilted treadmill simulating different outdoor walking conditions.
    Starholm IM; Gjovaag T; Mengshoel AM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 20141493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
    Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
    Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the effects of carbon fiber and bionic foot during overground and treadmill walking in transtibial amputees.
    Delussu AS; Brunelli S; Paradisi F; Iosa M; Pellegrini R; Zenardi D; Traballesi M
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):876-82. PubMed ID: 23702342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
    Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking.
    Houdijk H; Pollmann E; Groenewold M; Wiggerts H; Polomski W
    Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19321343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.
    Boonstra AM; Schrama J; Fidler V; Eisma WH
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Jun; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 7569824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
    Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of aerobic capacity and walking economy of unilateral transfemoral amputees.
    Gjovaag T; Starholm IM; Mirtaheri P; Hegge FW; Skjetne K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 23798044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.
    Chin T; Maeda Y; Sawamura S; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17979012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket: a comparison of energy cost during ambulation.
    Gailey RS; Lawrence D; Burditt C; Spyropoulos P; Newell C; Nash MS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 8233775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless.
    Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the walking ability of young transfemoral amputees: comparison of IP users with able-bodied people.
    Chin T; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K; Nakagawa A
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 82(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 12820787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure characteristics at the stump/socket interface in transtibial amputees using an adaptive prosthetic foot.
    Wolf SI; Alimusaj M; Fradet L; Siegel J; Braatz F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):860-5. PubMed ID: 19744755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Energy cost of walking: comparison of "intelligent prosthesis" with conventional mechanism.
    Buckley JG; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 78(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 9084360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
    Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.