130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21684517)
1. The influence of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Lewin SN; Deutsch I; Burke WM; Sun X; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 21684517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
Wright JD; Hershman DL; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Lewin SN; Herzog TJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 21989660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgeon and hospital volumes on short-term postoperative complications after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Yasunaga H; Nishii O; Hirai Y; Ochiai K; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Aug; 35(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 19751330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists.
Covens A; Rosen B; Gibbons A; Osborne R; Murphy J; DePetrillo A; Lickrish G; Shaw P; Colgan T
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8244172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation.
Bansal N; Herzog TJ; Shaw RE; Burke WM; Deutsch I; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):485.e1-9. PubMed ID: 19879394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A national analysis of the relationship between hospital volume, academic center status, and surgical outcomes for abdominal hysterectomy done for leiomyoma.
Juillard C; Lashoher A; Sewell CA; Uddin S; Griffith JG; Chang DC
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Apr; 208(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 19476796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Neugut AI; Burke WM; Lu YS; Lewin SN; Hershman DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22735788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-hospital mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume.
Barker FG; Amin-Hanjani S; Butler WE; Ogilvy CS; Carter BS
Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):995-1007; discussion 1007-9. PubMed ID: 12699540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.
Wallenstein MR; Ananth CV; Kim JH; Burke WM; Hershman DL; Lewin SN; Neugut AI; Lu YS; Herzog TJ; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Apr; 119(4):709-16. PubMed ID: 22433333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of survival and side effects in two periods with a different approach to radical hysterectomy as treatment of cervical cancer stages Ib and IIa.
Knudsen HJ; Rasmussen KL; Ledertoug S; Mamsen A; Nyland MH; Jakobsen A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(9):476-80. PubMed ID: 7483882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty?
Park HS; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1060-7. PubMed ID: 19917944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
