1110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21684657)
1. Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible.
Kaduk WM; Podmelle F; Louis PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):421-8. PubMed ID: 21684657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurosensory alterations and function of the temporomandibular joint after high oblique sagittal split osteotomy: an alternative technique in orthognathic surgery.
Seeberger R; Asi Y; Thiele OC; Hoffmann J; Stucke K; Engel M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 51(6):536-40. PubMed ID: 23260982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation.
Lai W; Yamada K; Hanada K; Ali IM; Takagi R; Kobayashi T; Hayashi T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11934051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.
Hsu SS; Huang CS; Chen PK; Ko EW; Chen YR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 22129998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of bone healing and hypoesthesia in the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate and absorbable plates.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K; Kawashiri S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22819299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages.
Mavili ME; Canter HI; Saglam-Aydinatay B
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 19745712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resorbable versus titanium osteosynthesis devices in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible - the results of a two centre randomised clinical study with an eight-year follow-up.
Stockmann P; Böhm H; Driemel O; Mühling J; Pistner H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):522-8. PubMed ID: 20338772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators.
van Merkesteyn JP; Zweers A; Corputty JE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):222-6. PubMed ID: 17681774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative awakening of the patient during orthognathic surgery: a method to prevent the condylar sag.
Politi M; Toro C; Costa F; Polini F; Robiony M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17174773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.
Høgevold HE; Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Skjelbred P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 29(4):205-11; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 11562089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facial nerve palsy following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for setback of the mandible.
Ruiz LP; Lara JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 21474283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The assessment of the short- and long-term changes in the condylar position following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid fixation.
Kim YI; Jung YH; Cho BH; Kim JR; Kim SS; Son WS; Park SB
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 20113391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new condyle repositionable plate for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Baek RM; Lee SW
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):489-90. PubMed ID: 20216449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovery pattern of mandibular movement by active physical therapy after bilateral transoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Jung HD; Jung YS; Park JH; Park HS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):e431-7. PubMed ID: 22698299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique.
Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23102564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthognathic surgery without the use of postoperative intermaxillary fixation. A clinical and cephalometric evaluation of surgical correction of mandibular and maxillary deformities.
Krekmanov L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1989; 61():8-62. PubMed ID: 2652365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
