355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21685804)
1. Which is the preferred revision technique for loosened iliac screw? A novel technique of boring cement injection from the outer cortical shell.
Yu BS; Yang ZK; Li ZM; Zeng LW; Wang LB; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):E49-56. PubMed ID: 21685804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of insertion location and bone cement augmentation on the anchoring strength of iliac screw.
Yu BS; Li ZM; Zhou ZY; Zeng LW; Wang LB; Zheng ZM; Lu WW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jul; 26(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 21345556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Biomechanical effects of insertion location and bone cement augmentation on fixation strength of iliac screw].
Yu B; Li Z; Zheng Z; Zhou Z; Liang C; Li H; Han G
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1455-8. PubMed ID: 21261093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
Yu B; Zhuang X; Li Z; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision of loosened iliac screws: a biomechanical study of longer and bigger screws.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Sokolowski M; Transfeldt EE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):1423-8. PubMed ID: 18520937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Li ZM; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 20087222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanical effects of iliac screw plates on stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
Wang L; Pan H; Yu B; Xie C; Xu Y; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 23879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation.
Kiner DW; Wybo CD; Sterba W; Yeni YN; Bartol SW; Vaidya R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2618-22. PubMed ID: 19011543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.
Choma TJ; Pfeiffer FM; Swope RW; Hirner JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1628-32. PubMed ID: 22996264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the aging spine with a novel bioactive bone cement: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Kingwell S; Li Z; Pan H; Lu WW; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):E1030-7. PubMed ID: 22531472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method of partial screw augmentation in sheep vertebrae in vitro: biomechanical and interfacial evaluation.
Liu D; Wu ZX; Gao MX; Wan SY; Shi L; Fu SC; Wang J; Lei W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 21150670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A comparative analysis of Socon CS and Socon pedicle screws in view of their use for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbal spine--a biomechanical study].
Janů I; Kočiš J; Návrat T; Florian Z; Wendsche P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 21888844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of screw length and bone cement augmentation on the fixation strength of iliac screws: a biomechanical study.
Zheng ZM; Zhang KB; Zhang JF; Yu BS; Liu H; Zhuang XM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):545-50. PubMed ID: 19956027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of cannulated pedicle screws for fixation in osteoporotic spines and comparison of its clinical results and biomechanical characteristics with the needle injection method.
Chang MC; Kao HC; Ying SH; Liu CL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):305-15. PubMed ID: 23887077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative assessment of sacral screw loosening augmented with PMMA versus a calcium triglyceride bone cement.
McLachlin SD; Al Saleh K; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS; Dunning CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(11):E699-704. PubMed ID: 21289585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Biomechanical effect of the iliac screw insertion depth on lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
Chen H; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Lü Y; Zhang KB; Liu H; Li FB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 46(15):1179-82. PubMed ID: 19094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
