856 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21685806)
1. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geographic and demographic variability of cost and surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
Daffner SD; Beimesch CF; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1165-9. PubMed ID: 20421853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Wang HL; Lü FZ; Jiang JY; Ma X; Xia XL; Wang LX
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 22340311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws: comparison to muscle damage and minimally invasive techniques.
Dickerman RD; East JW; Winters K; Tackett J; Hajovsky-Pietla A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):E923-5. PubMed ID: 19940722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility analysis of minimally invasive versus open multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Davis BJ; Fulchiero E; Aaronson O; Cheng J; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21959840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioperative complications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS): comparison of MIS and open interbody fusion techniques.
Bagan B; Patel N; Deutsch H; Harrop J; Sharan A; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff JK
Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():281-6. PubMed ID: 18802914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
