These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21687462)

  • 1. Improving the estimation of psychometric functions in 2AFC discrimination tasks.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():96. PubMed ID: 21687462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Vorberg D; Ulrich R
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1157-74. PubMed ID: 22773433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 21910520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.
    Ulrich R; Vorberg D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 19633337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Indecision Model of Psychophysical Performance in Dual-Presentation Tasks: Parameter Estimation and Comparative Analysis of Response Formats.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1142. PubMed ID: 28747893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A quantitative method for determining spatial discriminative capacity.
    Zhang Z; Tannan V; Holden JK; Dennis RG; Tommerdahl M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2008 Mar; 7():12. PubMed ID: 18331644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Apr; 66(3):517-33. PubMed ID: 15283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Order effects in two-alternative forced-choice tasks invalidate adaptive threshold estimates.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2168-2187. PubMed ID: 32232736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive psychophysical methods for nonmonotonic psychometric functions.
    García-Pérez MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):621-41. PubMed ID: 24197504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Denoising forced-choice detection data.
    García-Pérez MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):75-100. PubMed ID: 19422731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical performance of optimal Bayesian adaptive estimation.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2009 May; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.
    Ellinghaus R; Bausenhart KM; Koc D; Ulrich R; Liepelt R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sucrose detection and discrimination estimated by the analysis of psychometric functions with linear and non-linear models.
    Chacon-Blanco R; Juarez-Enriquez E; Olivas GI; Jimenez J; Sepulveda DR
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2022 May; 73(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 34592903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A sliding two-alternative forced-choice paradigm for pitch discrimination.
    Arzounian D; de Kerangal M; de Cheveigné A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):167. PubMed ID: 28764422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four theorems on the psychometric function.
    May KA; Solomon JA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e74815. PubMed ID: 24124456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects.
    Ratcliff R; Voskuilen C; Teodorescu A
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():1-22. PubMed ID: 29501775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.