These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21688979)

  • 1. Inter-rater reliability of arm circumference measurement.
    Foroughi N; Dylke ES; Paterson RD; Sparrow KA; Fan J; Warwick EB; Kilbreath SL
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2011; 9(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 21688979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
    Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
    Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
    Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
    Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
    Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability, technical error of measurements and validity of instruments for nutritional status assessment of adults in Malaysia.
    Geeta A; Jamaiyah H; Safiza MN; Khor GL; Kee CC; Ahmad AZ; Suzana S; Rahmah R; Faudzi A
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1013-8. PubMed ID: 19907894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
    Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
    Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
    Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
    Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of measurements of mid-upper arm circumference in older persons.
    Wijnhoven HA; de Boer MR; van Maanen MJ; van Dongen DM; Kraaij SF; Smit T; Visser M
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2013 Feb; 26(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23279362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
    Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
    Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
    Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement between Perometry and Sequential Arm Circumference Measurements in Objective Determination of Arm Volume.
    Batista BN; Baiocchi JMT; Campanholi LL; Bergmann A; Duprat JP
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2018 Jan; 34(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 28841735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operational equivalence of bioimpedance indices and perometry for the assessment of unilateral arm lymphedema.
    Ward LC; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2009; 7(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 19522677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-Measured Arm Circumference in Women With Breast Cancer Is Reliable and Valid.
    Rafn BS; McNeely ML; Camp PG; Midtgaard J; Campbell KL
    Phys Ther; 2019 Feb; 99(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 30289500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
    Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
    Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive equations for estimation of stature in Malaysian elderly people.
    Shahar S; Pooy NS
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2003; 12(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 12737015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
    van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability measurements of lateral scapular slide test at three different degrees of shoulder joint abduction.
    Shadmehr A; Bagheri H; Ansari NN; Sarafraz H
    Br J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 44(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 18812417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of parental measurements of infant size.
    Bradley JL; Brown JE; Himes JH
    Am J Hum Biol; 2001; 13(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 11460874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater reliability for noninvasive measurement of cardiac function in children.
    Stewart GM; Nguyen HB; Kim TY; Jauregui J; Hayes SR; Corbett S
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2008 Jul; 24(7):433-7. PubMed ID: 18580818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.