155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21689055)
1. The COST - Action 2103 "Advanced Voice Function Assessment".
Dejonckere PH
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):51. PubMed ID: 21689055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Advanced voice function assessment: editorial introduction to this special issue.
Barney A; Kob M
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 25724282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards objective evaluation of perceived roughness and breathiness: an approach based on mel-frequency cepstral analysis.
Sáenz-Lechón N; Fraile R; Godino-Llorente JI; Fernández-Baíllo R; Osma-Ruiz V; Gutiérrez-Arriola JM; Arias-Londoño JD
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):52-9. PubMed ID: 20849245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic modeling of acoustic perception of breathiness in pathological voices.
Castillo-Guerra E; Ruíz A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):932-40. PubMed ID: 19423423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: evaluating vocal function.
Cohen W; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 22149459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders.
Xue SA; Lower A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1366-76. PubMed ID: 20815471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidirectional regression (MDR)-based features for automatic voice disorder detection.
Muhammad G; Mesallam TA; Malki KH; Farahat M; Mahmood A; Alsulaiman M
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e19-27. PubMed ID: 23177748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vibrato and tremor extent spectrum: algorithm and applications.
Vieira MN; Silva JE; Yehia HC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 21786861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis and Classification of Voice Pathologies Using Glottal Signal Parameters.
Forero M LA; Kohler M; Vellasco MM; Cataldo E
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 26474715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 2: subjective measurement of symptoms of voice disorder.
Cohen W; Wardrop A; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 22149600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli.
Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Lucero JC
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24117123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On combining information from modulation spectra and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients for automatic detection of pathological voices.
Arias-Londoño JD; Godino-Llorente JI; Markaki M; Stylianou Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 21073260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voice in chronic renal failure.
Kumar RB; Bhat JS
J Voice; 2010 Nov; 24(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 19811891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Objective Parameter for Quantifying the Turbulent Noise Portion of Voice Signals.
Lin L; Calawerts W; Dodd K; Jiang JJ
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):664-669. PubMed ID: 26474718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immediate Effect of Stimulability Assessment on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Patient-Perceptual Measures of Voice.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e9-507.e14. PubMed ID: 26233832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Recurrence Quantification Measures in Discriminating Subjects With and Without Voice Disorders.
Lopes LW; Vieira VJD; Costa SLDNC; Correia SÉN; Behlau M
J Voice; 2020 Mar; 34(2):208-220. PubMed ID: 30297102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural Voice Use in Patients With Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Speakers Based on 2 Days Voice Accumulator Information From a Database.
Södersten M; Salomão GL; McAllister A; Ternström S
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):646.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26073776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Rate of Divergence as an Objective Measure to Differentiate between Voice Signal Types Based on the Amount of Disorder in the Signal.
Calawerts WM; Lin L; Sprott JC; Jiang JJ
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 26920858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
