These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21690262)

  • 21. Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces.
    Kovács G; Iffland L; Vidnyánszky Z; Greenlee MW
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 22387172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces.
    Yi DJ; Kelley TA; Marois R; Chun MM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16507300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sources of adaptation of inferior temporal cortical responses.
    Vogels R
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():185-95. PubMed ID: 26518166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter-relationships between attention, activation, fMR adaptation and long-term memory.
    Chee MW; Tan JC
    Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 37(4):1487-95. PubMed ID: 17689983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Extensive stimulus repetition leads older adults to show delayed functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation.
    Miyakoshi M; Chen SH; Matsuo K; Wu CY; Suzuki A; Nakai T
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2012 Sep; 6(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 22274135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Repetition suppression for visual actions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.
    Kuravi P; Caggiano V; Giese M; Vogels R
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Mar; 115(3):1324-37. PubMed ID: 26745246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing the assumptions underlying fMRI adaptation using intracortical recordings in area MT.
    Kar K; Krekelberg B
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():21-34. PubMed ID: 26856637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repetition Suppression in Ventral Visual Cortex Is Diminished as a Function of Increasing Autistic Traits.
    Ewbank MP; Rhodes G; von dem Hagen EA; Powell TE; Bright N; Stoyanova RS; Baron-Cohen S; Calder AJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Oct; 25(10):3381-93. PubMed ID: 24988131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system.
    Feuerriegel D; Vogels R; Kovács G
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2021 Jul; 126():368-381. PubMed ID: 33836212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contributions of the parietal cortex to increased efficiency of planning-based action selection.
    Randerath J; Valyear KF; Philip BA; Frey SH
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Oct; 105():135-143. PubMed ID: 28438707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selecting appropriate designs and comparison conditions in repetition paradigms.
    Feuerriegel D
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():196-205. PubMed ID: 26654854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex.
    Haynes JD; Driver J; Rees G
    Neuron; 2005 Jun; 46(5):811-21. PubMed ID: 15924866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adolescents with autism show typical fMRI repetition suppression, but atypical surprise response.
    Utzerath C; Schmits IC; Buitelaar J; de Lange FP
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():25-34. PubMed ID: 30286304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.
    Ward EJ; Chun MM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 33(37):14749-57. PubMed ID: 24027275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Similar Expectation Effects for Immediate and Delayed Stimulus Repetitions.
    Amado C; Rostalski SM; Grotheer M; Wanke N; Kovács G
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1379. PubMed ID: 31920527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.
    Summerfield C; Trittschuh EH; Monti JM; Mesulam MM; Egner T
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 11(9):1004-6. PubMed ID: 19160497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural correlates of priming and adaptation in familiar face perception.
    Walther C; Schweinberger SR; Kaiser D; Kovács G
    Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1963-77. PubMed ID: 23021070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual quality determines the direction of neural repetition effects.
    Turk-Browne NB; Yi DJ; Leber AB; Chun MM
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Feb; 17(2):425-33. PubMed ID: 16565294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Category expectation modulates baseline and stimulus-evoked activity in human inferotemporal cortex.
    Puri AM; Wojciulik E; Ranganath C
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1301():89-99. PubMed ID: 19747463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repetition probability effects for inverted faces.
    Grotheer M; Hermann P; Vidnyánszky Z; Kovács G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():416-23. PubMed ID: 25123974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.