These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21691166)

  • 1. Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Salim R; Zafran N; Nachum Z; Garmi G; Kraiem N; Shalev E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 118(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21691166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lassey SC; Haber HR; Kanbergs A; Robinson JN; Little SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):611.e1-611.e8. PubMed ID: 33771496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Salim R; Schwartz N; Zafran N; Zuarez-Easton S; Garmi G; Romano S
    J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 38(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 29203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus.
    Xing Y; Li N; Ji Q; Hong L; Wang X; Xing B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():139-143. PubMed ID: 31704530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making cervical ripening EASI: a prospective controlled comparison of single versus double balloon catheters.
    Mei-Dan E; Walfisch A; Valencia C; Hallak M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Nov; 27(17):1765-70. PubMed ID: 24397244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].
    Pez V; Deruelle P; Kyheng M; Boyon C; Clouqueur E; Garabedian C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018; 46(7-8):570-574. PubMed ID: 29903553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single versus double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
    Lajusticia H; Martínez-Domínguez SJ; Pérez-Roncero GR; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 29445926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gu N; Ru T; Wang Z; Dai Y; Zheng M; Xu B; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136856. PubMed ID: 26322635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang F; Huang S; Long Y; Huang L
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jan; 44(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 29271034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
    Sarreau M; Isly H; Poulain P; Fontaine B; Morel O; Villemonteix P; Mares P; Mousty E; Godard A; Ragot S; Pierre F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 31432510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].
    He Y; Hu J; Zhang X; Huang H; Chen Q
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):741-5. PubMed ID: 25537244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trans-cervical double balloon catheter with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized trial.
    Walfisch A; Mei-Dan E; Hallak M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):848-53. PubMed ID: 24939630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic cervical length predicts vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section in women with low Bishop score induced with a double-balloon catheter.
    Diaz A; Aedo S; Burky D; Catalan A; Aguirre C; Acevedo M; Poehls R; Puebla V; Guerra F; Sepulveda W
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(24):4830-4836. PubMed ID: 33401988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hoppe KK; Schiff MA; Peterson SE; Gravett MG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(12):1919-25. PubMed ID: 26302817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
    Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
    Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery.
    Korb D; Renard S; Morin C; Merviel P; Sibony O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 32140810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
    Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
    Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
    BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.