877 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21691593)
1. Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces.
Pae A; Kim SS; Kim HS; Woo YH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 21691593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of a new porous surface for titanium implants.
Simon M; Lagneau C; Moreno J; Lissac M; Dalard F; Grosgogeat B
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 16324146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants.
Galli C; Piemontese M; Ravanetti F; Lumetti S; Passeri G; Gandolfini M; Macaluso GM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 22640672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological responses in osteoblast-like cell line according to thin layer hydroxyapatite coatings on anodized titanium.
Sohn SH; Jun HK; Kim CS; Kim KN; Chung SM; Shin SW; Ryu JJ; Kim MK
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):898-911. PubMed ID: 17168932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface modifications and cell-materials interactions with anodized Ti.
Das K; Bose S; Bandyopadhyay A
Acta Biomater; 2007 Jul; 3(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 17320494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment.
Rodriguez R; Kim K; Ong JL
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Jun; 65(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 12746882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of a niobium-containing titanium alloy on osteoblast behavior in culture.
Shapira L; Klinger A; Tadir A; Wilensky A; Halabi A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 19530314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of titanium surfaces with calcium and phosphate and osteoblast adhesion.
Feng B; Weng J; Yang BC; Qu SX; Zhang XD
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3421-8. PubMed ID: 15020115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of fluoride-modified titanium surfaces on osteoblast proliferation and gene expression.
Isa ZM; Schneider GB; Zaharias R; Seabold D; Stanford CM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 16634490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of possibly bioactive titanium implant surfaces.
Göransson A; Arvidsson A; Currie F; Franke-Stenport V; Kjellin P; Mustafa K; Sul YT; Wennerberg A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):1037-47. PubMed ID: 18404711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces.
Galli C; Guizzardi S; Passeri G; Martini D; Tinti A; Mauro G; Macaluso GM
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 15857069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced osteoblast response to hydrophilic strontium and/or phosphate ions-incorporated titanium oxide surfaces.
Park JW; Kim YJ; Jang JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 20128830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of biomimetic deposition on anodized titanium surfaces.
Kim MH; Lee SY; Kim MJ; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
J Dent Res; 2011 Jun; 90(6):711-6. PubMed ID: 21393553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study.
Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of surface implant treatments on the biological behavior of SaOS-2 osteoblast-like cells. An in vitro comparative study.
Conserva E; Menini M; Ravera G; Pera P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 22251013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arachidonic acid and prostaglandin E2 influence human osteoblast (MG63) response to titanium surface roughness.
Dean DD; Campbell CM; Gruwell SF; Tindall JW; Chuang HH; Zhong W; Schmitz JP; Sylvia VL
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(6):303-12. PubMed ID: 19133484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation.
Romanos G; Crespi R; Barone A; Covani U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):232-6. PubMed ID: 16634493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation.
Sader MS; Balduino A; Soares Gde A; Borojevic R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):667-75. PubMed ID: 16307573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced initial cell responses to chemically modified anodized titanium.
Jimbo R; Sawase T; Baba K; Kurogi T; Shibata Y; Atsuta M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 18254741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone cell attachment to dental implants of different surface characteristics.
Lumbikanonda N; Sammons R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):627-36. PubMed ID: 11669244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
