These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21691598)
1. Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study. Nokar S; Moslehifard E; Bahman T; Bayanzadeh M; Nasirpouri F; Nokar A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 21691598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results. Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region. Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II. Kero T; Pettersson A; Fäldt J; Andersson M; Gillot L; Cannas B; Näsström K; Söderberg R J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study. Horwitz J; Zuabi O; Machtei EE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1156-62. PubMed ID: 19519787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure. Fortin T; Isidori M; Bouchet H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study. Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method. Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1530-5. PubMed ID: 24954760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery. Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rehabilitation of a dentate mandible requiring a full arch rehabilitation. Immediate loading of a fixed complete denture on 8 implants placed with a bone-supported surgical computer-planned guide: a case report. Amorfini L; Storelli S; Romeo E J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():106-13. PubMed ID: 21495798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. Marchack CB J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 17618922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach. Komiyama A; Pettersson A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20868453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]