BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21691914)

  • 21. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT, CT and MR compared to fractional flow reserve as reference standard.
    Yang Z; Zheng H; Zhou T; Yang LF; Hu XF; Peng ZH; Jiang YZ; Li M; Sun G
    Int J Cardiol; 2015; 190():103-5. PubMed ID: 25920018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximizing the clinical value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Beller GA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 18(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21225483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting nuclear cardiology: a joint position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).
    Trägårdh E; Hesse B; Knuuti J; Flotats A; Kaufmann PA; Kitsiou A; Hacker M; Verberne HJ; Edenbrandt L; Delgado V; Donal E; Edvardsen T; Galderisi M; Habib G; Lancellotti P; Nieman K; Rosenhek R; ; Agostini D; Gimelli A; Lindner O; Slart R; Ubleis C;
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 16(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 25618478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Creation and characterization of Japanese standards for myocardial perfusion SPECT: database from the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Working Group.
    Nakajima K; Kumita S; Ishida Y; Momose M; Hashimoto J; Morita K; Taki J; Yamashina S; Maruno H; Ogawa M; Kubota M; Takahashi M; Odagawa T; Yokozuka K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Nov; 21(9):505-11. PubMed ID: 18030582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for brain perfusion SPET using (99m)Tc-labelled radiopharmaceuticals.
    Tatsch K; Asenbaum S; Bartenstein P; Catafau A; Halldin C; Pilowsky LS; Pupi A;
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Oct; 29(10):BP36-42. PubMed ID: 12436497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-centered imaging.
    Depuey EG; Mahmarian JJ; Miller TD; Einstein AJ; Hansen CL; Holly TA; Miller EJ; Polk DM; Samuel Wann L
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 19(2):185-215. PubMed ID: 22328324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Letter by Heston regarding article, "comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial".
    Heston TF
    Circulation; 2012 May; 125(19):e933; author reply e932-5. PubMed ID: 22586299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Letter by Palmas regarding article, "comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial".
    Palmas W
    Circulation; 2012 May; 125(19):e932; author reply e932-5. PubMed ID: 22586298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Hage FG; AlJaroudi WA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1390-1399. PubMed ID: 29663117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should exercise myocardial perfusion imaging be the standard noninvasive approach for the initial evaluation of symptomatic women with suspected coronary artery disease?
    Chaitman BR; Reis LJ
    Circulation; 2011 Sep; 124(11):1207-9. PubMed ID: 21911793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Letter by Kuller and Wong regarding article, "comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the What Is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) trial".
    Kuller LH; Wong TC
    Circulation; 2012 May; 125(19):e931; author reply e932-5. PubMed ID: 22586297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Procedure guideline for brain perfusion SPECT using (99m)Tc radiopharmaceuticals 3.0.
    Juni JE; Waxman AD; Devous MD; Tikofsky RS; Ichise M; Van Heertum RL; Carretta RF; Chen CC;
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2009 Sep; 37(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 19692453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Normal values and standardization of parameters in nuclear cardiology: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database.
    Nakajima K; Matsumoto N; Kasai T; Matsuo S; Kiso K; Okuda K
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 30(3):188-99. PubMed ID: 26897008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures : Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures.
    Tilkemeier PL; Bourque J; Doukky R; Sanghani R; Weinberg RL
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2064-2128. PubMed ID: 28916938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. The Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology; The Committee on Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Technology, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; and Board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 20(1):255-6. PubMed ID: 1607534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intersocietal Accreditation Commission.
    Sloper TA
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):10A. PubMed ID: 27261494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association.
    Brindis RG; Douglas PS; Hendel RC; Peterson ED; Wolk MJ; Allen JM; Patel MR; Raskin IE; Hendel RC; Bateman TM; Cerqueira MD; Gibbons RJ; Gillam LD; Gillespie JA; Hendel RC; Iskandrian AE; Jerome SD; Krumholz HM; Messer JV; Spertus JA; Stowers SA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(8):1587-605. PubMed ID: 16226194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are cardiologists truly better at appropriately selecting patients for stress myocardial perfusion imaging?
    Doukky R; Hayes K; Frogge N
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 176(1):285-6. PubMed ID: 25042647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coming-of-age: The ImageGuide™ Registry at three.
    Tilkemeier PL; Doukky R; Kirkpatrick JN; Desai MY; Nagueh SF
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 26(1):72-75. PubMed ID: 30218217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inappropriate utilization of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging on the USA-Mexico border.
    Lalude OO; Gutarra MF; Pollono EN; Lee S; Tarwater PM
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 24627346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.