These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21692086)

  • 41. Application of the BACs-on-Beads assay for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in Quanzhou, China.
    Zhuang J; Chen C; Jiang Y; Luo Q; Zeng S; Lv C; Wang Y; Fu W
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33509128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis.
    Shaffer LG; Bui TH
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 17290441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1459-67. PubMed ID: 18055749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).
    Hochstenbach R; Meijer J; van de Brug J; Vossebeld-Hoff I; Jansen R; van der Luijt RB; Sinke RJ; Page-Christiaens GC; Ploos van Amstel JK; de Pater JM
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Nov; 25(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 16231311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.
    Leung WC; Waters JJ; Chitty L
    Prenat Diagn; 2004 Oct; 24(10):790-5. PubMed ID: 15503279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Fetal gender and aneuploidy detection using fetal cells in maternal blood: analysis of NIFTY I data. National Institute of Child Health and Development Fetal Cell Isolation Study.
    Bianchi DW; Simpson JL; Jackson LG; Elias S; Holzgreve W; Evans MI; Dukes KA; Sullivan LM; Klinger KW; Bischoff FZ; Hahn S; Johnson KL; Lewis D; Wapner RJ; de la Cruz F
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):609-15. PubMed ID: 12124698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Factors influencing parental decision making in prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy.
    Mezei G; Papp C; Tóth-Pál E; Beke A; Papp Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 15229006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Application of BACs-on-Beads
    Zeng Y; Wang T; Zhang T; Fan J; Zhang L; Qian F; Luo T; Chen W; Che M; Qian C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 37(8):891-894. PubMed ID: 32761603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy.
    Mann K; Donaghue C; Fox SP; Docherty Z; Ogilvie CM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 12(11):907-15. PubMed ID: 15292918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The scope of prenatal diagnostic testing for chromosomal aberrations: broad or narrow? Ethical considerations on the choice of tests].
    de Jong A; Dondorp WJ; de Wert GM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A1060. PubMed ID: 20015413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Detection of circulating fetal cells utilizing automated microscopy: potential for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies.
    Seppo A; Frisova V; Ichetovkin I; Kim Y; Evans MI; Antsaklis A; Nicolaides KH; Tafas T; Tsipouras P; Kilpatrick MW
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):815-21. PubMed ID: 18646239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region.
    Hills A; Donaghue C; Waters J; Waters K; Sullivan C; Kulkarni A; Docherty Z; Mann K; Ogilvie CM
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jun; 30(6):509-17. PubMed ID: 20509149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.
    García-Herrero S; Campos-Galindo I; Martínez-Conejero JA; Serra V; Olmo I; Lara C; Simón C; Rubio C
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():590298. PubMed ID: 24795887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Significance of detecting free DNA from maternal plasma for the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies].
    Liu HY; Wu D; Li H; Guo SK; Zhang CY; Liao SX; Wang YT
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 29(4):435-8. PubMed ID: 22875501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidy by quantitative fluorescence PCR.
    Mann K; Petek E; Pertl B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 444():71-94. PubMed ID: 18425473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy using quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR).
    Ogilvie CM; Donaghue C; Fox SP; Docherty Z; Mann K
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2005 Mar; 53(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 15750003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Medical genetics in reproductive medicine].
    Macek M; Vilímová S; Potuzníková P; Yurov Y; Vorsanova S; Diblík J; Krebsová A; Machatková M; Koudová M; Alánová R; Matĕjcková M; Hladíková E; Broucková M; Hüttelová R; Vincenciová R; Paulasová P; Brandjeská M; Uhrová E; Kratĕnová A; Smetanová I; Novotná D; Chudoba D; Kulovaný E; Krutílková V; Hromadníková I; Mardesic T; Macek M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2002; 141(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11899543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prenatal microarray analysis as second-tier diagnostic test: single-center prospective study.
    Schmid M; Stary S; Springer S; Bettelheim D; Husslein P; Streubel B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 23292918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).
    Gerdes T; Kirchhoff M; Lind AM; Larsen GV; Schwartz M; Lundsteen C
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2005 Feb; 13(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 15483643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Chromosomal microarray vs. NIPS: analysis of 5541 low-risk pregnancies.
    Sagi-Dain L; Cohen Vig L; Kahana S; Yacobson S; Tenne T; Agmon-Fishman I; Klein C; Matar R; Basel-Salmon L; Maya I
    Genet Med; 2019 Nov; 21(11):2462-2467. PubMed ID: 31123319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.