These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21692640)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
    Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
    Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
    Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
    Braun M
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
    Barolet D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
    Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between sequentional treatment with diode and alexandrite lasers versus alexandrite laser alone in the treatment of hirsutism.
    Nilforoushzadeh MA; Naieni FF; Siadat AH; Rad L
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Nov; 10(11):1255-9. PubMed ID: 22052304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hair structures are effectively altered during 810 nm diode laser hair epilation at low fluences.
    Trelles MA; Urdiales F; Al-Zarouni M
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Mar; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19585319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
    Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
    Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
    Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
    Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epilation with a long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in facial hirsutism.
    Lévy JL; Trelles MA; de Ramecourt A
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2001 Dec; 3(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 12554325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized bilateral vehicle-controlled study of eflornithine cream combined with laser treatment versus laser treatment alone for facial hirsutism in women.
    Hamzavi I; Tan E; Shapiro J; Lui H
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 57(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17270315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
    Wheeland RG
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 810 nm diode laser for hair reduction with Chill-tip technology: prospective observational analysis of 55 patients of Fitzpatrick skin types III, IV,V.
    Tulpule MS; Bhide DS; Bharatia P; Rathod NU
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2020 Feb; 22(2):65-69. PubMed ID: 32054369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hair removal with the long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd:YAG lasers is safe and well tolerated in children.
    Rajpar SF; Hague JS; Abdullah A; Lanigan SW
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2009 Aug; 34(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 19175616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal.
    Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised, split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system.
    McGill DJ; Hutchison C; McKenzie E; McSherry E; Mackay IR
    Lasers Surg Med; 2007 Dec; 39(10):767-72. PubMed ID: 18081147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days.
    Bouzari N; Tabatabai H; Abbasi Z; Firooz A; Dowlati Y
    Int J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 44(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 15663662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.