216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21692640)
1. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.
Pai GS; Bhat PS; Mallya H; Gold M
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7. PubMed ID: 21692640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 8(11 Suppl):s14-7. PubMed ID: 19916262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.
Wanitphakdeedecha R; Thanomkitti K; Sethabutra P; Eimpunth S; Manuskiatti W
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1133-6. PubMed ID: 21923659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.
Li W; Liu C; Chen Z; Cai L; Zhou C; Xu Q; Li H; Zhang J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016 Nov; 18(7):393-396. PubMed ID: 27419804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.
Braun M
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Jan; 10(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 21197525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
Barolet D
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.
Koo B; Ball K; Tremaine AM; Zachary CB
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Apr; 46(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 24752608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between sequentional treatment with diode and alexandrite lasers versus alexandrite laser alone in the treatment of hirsutism.
Nilforoushzadeh MA; Naieni FF; Siadat AH; Rad L
J Drugs Dermatol; 2011 Nov; 10(11):1255-9. PubMed ID: 22052304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hair structures are effectively altered during 810 nm diode laser hair epilation at low fluences.
Trelles MA; Urdiales F; Al-Zarouni M
J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Mar; 21(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 19585319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.
Chen J; Liu XJ; Huo MH
Australas J Dermatol; 2012 Aug; 53(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 22881465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study.
Sochor M; Curkova AK; Schwarczova Z; Sochorova R; Simaljakova M; Buchvald J
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2011 Oct; 13(5):210-5. PubMed ID: 21932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epilation with a long-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in facial hirsutism.
Lévy JL; Trelles MA; de Ramecourt A
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2001 Dec; 3(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 12554325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized bilateral vehicle-controlled study of eflornithine cream combined with laser treatment versus laser treatment alone for facial hirsutism in women.
Hamzavi I; Tan E; Shapiro J; Lui H
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 57(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 17270315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
Wheeland RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 810 nm diode laser for hair reduction with Chill-tip technology: prospective observational analysis of 55 patients of Fitzpatrick skin types III, IV,V.
Tulpule MS; Bhide DS; Bharatia P; Rathod NU
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2020 Feb; 22(2):65-69. PubMed ID: 32054369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hair removal with the long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd:YAG lasers is safe and well tolerated in children.
Rajpar SF; Hague JS; Abdullah A; Lanigan SW
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2009 Aug; 34(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 19175616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: Side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal.
Paasch U; Wagner JA; Paasch HW
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015; 17(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 25607745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomised, split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system.
McGill DJ; Hutchison C; McKenzie E; McSherry E; Mackay IR
Lasers Surg Med; 2007 Dec; 39(10):767-72. PubMed ID: 18081147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days.
Bouzari N; Tabatabai H; Abbasi Z; Firooz A; Dowlati Y
Int J Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 44(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 15663662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
