90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21692815)
41. Estimation of the relative stratum corneum amount removed by tape stripping.
Jacobi U; Weigmann HJ; Ulrich J; Sterry W; Lademann J
Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15807805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of cyclodextrins on in vitro human skin absorption of the sunscreen, butyl-methoxydibenzoylmethane.
Simeoni S; Scalia S; Benson HA
Int J Pharm; 2004 Aug; 280(1-2):163-71. PubMed ID: 15265556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A critical comparison of methods to quantify stratum corneum removed by tape stripping.
Marttin E; Neelissen-Subnel MT; De Haan FH; Boddé HE
Skin Pharmacol; 1996; 9(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 8868035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The evaluation of the amount of cis- and trans-urocanic acid in the stratum corneum by Raman spectroscopy.
Egawa M; Nomura J; Iwaki H
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 May; 9(5):730-3. PubMed ID: 20442934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A double-blind, randomized assessment of the irritant potential of sunscreen chemical dilutions used in photopatch testing.
Kerr AC; Niklasson B; Dawe RS; Escoffier AM; Krasteva M; Sanderson B; Ferguson J
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 19338588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Dermatopharmacokinetics of betamethasone 17-valerate: influence of formulation viscosity and skin surface cleaning procedure.
Wiedersberg S; Leopold CS; Guy RH
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2009 Feb; 71(2):362-6. PubMed ID: 18940255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Gain or loss? Sunscreen efficiency after cosmetic pretreatment of the skin.
Kluschke F; Weigmann HJ; Schanzer S; Meinke M; Vergou T; Sterry W; Lademann J
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 24052131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Human skin penetration of sunscreen nanoparticles: in-vitro assessment of a novel micronized zinc oxide formulation.
Cross SE; Innes B; Roberts MS; Tsuzuki T; Robertson TA; McCormick P
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2007; 20(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 17230054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reapplication improves the amount of sunscreen, not its regularity, under real life conditions.
De Villa D; Nagatomi AR; Paese K; Guterres S; Cestari TF
Photochem Photobiol; 2011; 87(2):457-60. PubMed ID: 21143606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Three-dimensional chemical imaging of skin using stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.
Drutis DM; Hancewicz TM; Pashkovski E; Feng L; Mihalov D; Holtom G; Ananthapadmanabhan KP; Xie XS; Misra M
J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(11):111604. PubMed ID: 24858033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Sunscreen enhancement of UV-induced reactive oxygen species in the skin.
Hanson KM; Gratton E; Bardeen CJ
Free Radic Biol Med; 2006 Oct; 41(8):1205-12. PubMed ID: 17015167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Complexation of the sunscreen agent, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor with cyclodextrins: effect on photostability and human stratum corneum penetration.
Scalia S; Tursilli R; Iannuccelli V
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2007 May; 44(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 17291707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of daily versus intermittent sunscreen application on solar simulated UV radiation-induced skin response in humans.
Phillips TJ; Bhawan J; Yaar M; Bello Y; Lopiccolo D; Nash JF
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2000 Oct; 43(4):610-8. PubMed ID: 11004615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Infrared densitometry: a fast and non-destructive method for exact stratum corneum depth calculation for in vitro tape-stripping.
Hahn T; Hansen S; Neumann D; Kostka KH; Lehr CM; Muys L; Schaefer UF
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2010; 23(4):183-92. PubMed ID: 20173360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Non-invasive depth profile imaging of the stratum corneum using confocal Raman microscopy: first insights into the method.
Ashtikar M; Matthäus C; Schmitt M; Krafft C; Fahr A; Popp J
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Dec; 50(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 23764946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Effects of physical and chemical treatments upon biophysical properties and micro-relief of human skin.
Atrux-Tallau N; Huynh NT; Gardette L; Pailler-Mattéi C; Zahouani H; Viviant E; Hirsch H; Marek H; Falson F; Pirot F
Arch Dermatol Res; 2008 Jun; 300(5):243-51. PubMed ID: 18386023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vivo microdialysis for the investigation of drug levels in the dermis and the effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous drug penetration. Studies in hairless rats and human subjects.
Benfeldt E
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1999; 206():1-59. PubMed ID: 10605601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. In vivo and in vitro assessment of UVA protection by sunscreen formulations containing either butyl methoxy dibenzoyl methane, methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol, or microfine ZnO.
Herzog B; Mongiat S; Deshayes C; Neuhaus M; Sommer K; Mantler A
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2002 Jun; 24(3):170-85. PubMed ID: 18498509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In Vivo Human Skin Penetration Study of Sunscreens by Confocal Raman Spectroscopy.
Tippavajhala VK; de Oliveira Mendes T; Martin AA
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2018 Feb; 19(2):753-760. PubMed ID: 28983836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Non-destructive determination of TiO2 concentration in cream formulation using Raman spectroscopy.
Oh C; Yoon S; Kim E; Han J; Chung H; Jeong HJ
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2010 Nov; 53(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 20538420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
