229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21694598)
1. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
Dobie RA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of the pure-tone average from the speech reception and auditory brainstem response thresholds in a geriatric population.
Chien CH; Tu TY; Shiao AS; Chien SF; Wang YF; Li AC; Yang MJ
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 18984972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing aids reduce overestimation in pre-fitting self-assessment.
Nishimura T; Uratani Y; Fukuda F; Saito O; Hosoi H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Apr; 39(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 21601392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
Corthals P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.
Watson CS; Kidd GR; Miller JD; Smits C; Humes LE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):757-67. PubMed ID: 23169193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Functional hearing loss in speech audiometry (author's transl)].
Stoll W; Kumpf W
HNO; 1978 Jun; 26(6):206-12. PubMed ID: 669997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Evaluation of the World Health Organization and American Medical Association Ratings of Hearing Impairment and Simulated Single-Sided Deafness.
Vermiglio AJ; Griffin S; Post C; Fang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(7):634-647. PubMed ID: 29988011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships among speech perception, self-rated tinnitus loudness and disability in tinnitus patients with normal pure-tone thresholds of hearing.
Huang CY; Lee HH; Chung KC; Chen HC; Shen YJ; Wu JL
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007; 69(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17085949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
