These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21695024)

  • 1. An optimal centralized carbon dioxide repository for Florida, USA.
    Poiencot B; Brown C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Apr; 8(4):955-975. PubMed ID: 21695024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planning, designing, operating, and regulating a geologic sequestration repository as an underground landfill--a review.
    Brown CJ; Poiencot B; Sornberger C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1306-18. PubMed ID: 22263419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An optimization model for carbon capture & storage/utilization vs. carbon trading: A case study of fossil-fired power plants in Turkey.
    Ağralı S; Üçtuğ FG; Türkmen BA
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 215():305-315. PubMed ID: 29574208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage.
    Hardisty PE; Sivapalan M; Brooks P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 May; 8(5):1460-77. PubMed ID: 21655130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers and Prospects of Carbon Sequestration in India.
    Gupta A; Nema AK
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2014 Apr; 56(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 26563072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations--coalbeds and deep saline aquifers.
    White CM; Strazisar BR; Granite EJ; Hoffman JS; Pennline HW;
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Jun; 53(6):645-715. PubMed ID: 12828330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coping with carbon: a near-term strategy to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power stations.
    Breeze P
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Nov; 366(1882):3891-900. PubMed ID: 18757277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.
    Anderson JJ; Rode DC; Zhai H; Fischbeck PS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 56(16):11162-11171. PubMed ID: 35926127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deep seam and minesoil carbon sequestration potential of the South Wales Coalfield, UK.
    Detheridge A; Hosking LJ; Thomas HR; Sarhosis V; Gwynn-Jones D; Scullion J
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Oct; 248():109325. PubMed ID: 31376613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
    Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coal and biomass to fuels and power.
    Williams RH; Liu G; Kreutz TG; Larson ED
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2011; 2():529-53. PubMed ID: 22432630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategic Carbon Dioxide Infrastructure to Achieve a Low-Carbon Power Sector in the Midwestern and South-Central United States.
    Tao Y; Edwards RWJ; Mauzerall DL; Celia MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 55(22):15013-15024. PubMed ID: 34714051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan.
    Craig MT; Jaramillo P; Zhai H; Klima K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 28001378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost Analysis of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from U.S. Natural Gas-Fired Power Plants.
    Psarras P; He J; Pilorgé H; McQueen N; Jensen-Fellows A; Kian K; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(10):6272-6280. PubMed ID: 32329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Siting is a constraint to realize environmental benefits from carbon capture and storage.
    Sekar A; Williams E; Chester M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11705-12. PubMed ID: 25187199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Policy-Driven Potential for Deploying Carbon Capture and Sequestration in a Fossil-Rich Power Sector.
    Dindi A; Coddington K; Garofalo JF; Wu W; Zhai H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jul; 56(14):9872-9881. PubMed ID: 35785993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thermodynamic analysis of low-temperature carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide capture from coal-burning power plants.
    Swanson CE; Elzey JW; Hershberger RE; Donnelly RJ; Pfotenhauer J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jul; 86(1 Pt 2):016103. PubMed ID: 23005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.