257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21695233)
1. Testing the ortholog conjecture with comparative functional genomic data from mammals.
Nehrt NL; Clark WT; Radivojac P; Hahn MW
PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jun; 7(6):e1002073. PubMed ID: 21695233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ortholog conjecture is untestable by the current gene ontology but is supported by RNA sequencing data.
Chen X; Zhang J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(11):e1002784. PubMed ID: 23209392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene family level comparative analysis of gene expression in mammals validates the ortholog conjecture.
Rogozin IB; Managadze D; Shabalina SA; Koonin EV
Genome Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 6(4):754-62. PubMed ID: 24610837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ortholog conjecture revisited: the value of orthologs and paralogs in function prediction.
Stamboulian M; Guerrero RF; Hahn MW; Radivojac P
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i219-i226. PubMed ID: 32657391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Phylogenetic Rate Parameter Indicates Different Sequence Divergence Patterns in Orthologs and Paralogs.
Ahrens JB; Teufel AI; Siltberg-Liberles J
J Mol Evol; 2020 Dec; 88(10):720-730. PubMed ID: 33118098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs.
Altenhoff AM; Studer RA; Robinson-Rechavi M; Dessimoz C
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(5):e1002514. PubMed ID: 22615551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Use of Gene Ontology Annotations to Assess Functional Similarity among Orthologs and Paralogs: A Short Report.
Thomas PD; Wood V; Mungall CJ; Lewis SE; Blake JA;
PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(2):e1002386. PubMed ID: 22359495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue-Specificity of Gene Expression Diverges Slowly between Orthologs, and Rapidly between Paralogs.
Kryuchkova-Mostacci N; Robinson-Rechavi M
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005274. PubMed ID: 28030541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Domain architecture conservation in orthologs.
Forslund K; Pekkari I; Sonnhammer EL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 12():326. PubMed ID: 21819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons.
Remm M; Storm CE; Sonnhammer EL
J Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 314(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 11743721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reviews in comparative genomic research based on orthologs].
Pan ZX; Xu D; Zhang JB; Lin F; Wu BJ; Liu HL
Yi Chuan; 2009 May; 31(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 19586838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complexity of gene expression evolution after duplication: protein dosage rebalancing.
Rogozin IB
Genet Res Int; 2014; 2014():516508. PubMed ID: 25197576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs.
Peterson ME; Chen F; Saven JG; Roos DS; Babbitt PC; Sali A
Protein Sci; 2009 Jun; 18(6):1306-15. PubMed ID: 19472362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Humanization of yeast genes with multiple human orthologs reveals functional divergence between paralogs.
Laurent JM; Garge RK; Teufel AI; Wilke CO; Kachroo AH; Marcotte EM
PLoS Biol; 2020 May; 18(5):e3000627. PubMed ID: 32421706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data.
Hulsen T; Huynen MA; de Vlieg J; Groenen PM
Genome Biol; 2006; 7(4):R31. PubMed ID: 16613613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthology confers intron position conservation.
Henricson A; Forslund K; Sonnhammer EL
BMC Genomics; 2010 Jul; 11():412. PubMed ID: 20598118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene-oriented ortholog database: a functional comparison platform for orthologous loci.
Ho MR; Chen CH; Lin WC
Database (Oxford); 2010; 2010():baq002. PubMed ID: 20428317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using shared genomic synteny and shared protein functions to enhance the identification of orthologous gene pairs.
Zheng XH; Lu F; Wang ZY; Zhong F; Hoover J; Mural R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 15458983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mouse-human orthologs.
Nembaware V; Crum K; Kelso J; Seoighe C
Genome Res; 2002 Sep; 12(9):1370-6. PubMed ID: 12213774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When orthologs diverge between human and mouse.
Gharib WH; Robinson-Rechavi M
Brief Bioinform; 2011 Sep; 12(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 21677033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
