These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21696115)

  • 1. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study.
    Kumar AG; Bansal A
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21696115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Dinçer M; Isik Aslan B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19726491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    O'Rourke N; Albeedh H; Sharma P; Johal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens.
    Jäderberg S; Feldmann I; Engström C
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 21508267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthodontic retention to have and to hold.
    Kalha AS
    Evid Based Dent; 2016 Dec; 17(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 27980334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Manzon L; Fratto G; Rossi E; Buccheri A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun; 153(6):852-860. PubMed ID: 29853243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effects of modified and full-coverage thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M; Salmanli O; Qasem MA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e198-208. PubMed ID: 23646330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector/spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion.
    Horton JK; Buschang PH; Oliver DR; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 19524832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of thermoplastic retainers on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus adhesion.
    Türköz C; Canigür Bavbek N; Kale Varlik S; Akça G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 22554754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear.
    Thickett E; Power S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19828592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Part-time versus full-time retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial.
    Gill DS; Naini FB; Jones A; Tredwin CJ
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 17902334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hawley retainers full- or part-time? A randomized clinical trial.
    Shawesh M; Bhatti B; Usmani T; Mandall N
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 19797411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers.
    Booth FA; Edelman JM; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18174074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear.
    Wong P; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 16433081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized occlusal analysis of Essix and Hawley retainers used during the retention phase: a controlled clinical trial.
    Alkan Ö; Kaya Y; Keskin S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):371-381. PubMed ID: 32472340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Demir A; Babacan H; Nalcacı R; Topcuoglu T
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 42(5):255-62. PubMed ID: 23173119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer].
    Xu XC; Li RM; Tang GH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.