These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21696115)

  • 21. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study.
    Tacken MP; Cosyn J; De Wilde P; Aerts J; Govaerts E; Vannet BV
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 19837746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.
    Ashari A; Nik Mustapha NM; Yuen JJX; Saw ZK; Lau MN; Xian L; Syed Mohamed AMF; Megat Abdul Wahab R; Yeoh CK; Deva Tata M; Sinnasamy S
    Prog Orthod; 2022 Aug; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 36018418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse.
    Renkema AM; Al-Assad S; Bronkhorst E; Weindel S; Katsaros C; Lisson JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):179e1-8. PubMed ID: 18675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech.
    Atik E; Esen Aydinli F; Kulak Kayikçi ME; Ciger S
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 27507127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term Effectiveness of Maxillary and Mandibular Bonded Orthodontic Retainers.
    Kocher KE; Gebistorf MC; Pandis N; Fudalej PS; Katsaros C
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2020 Jul; 18(3):633-641. PubMed ID: 32700517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up.
    Kara B; Yilmaz B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32241360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer.
    Chang CS; Al-Awadi S; Ready D; Noar J
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 24536071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Rowland H; Hichens L; Williams A; Hills D; Killingback N; Ewings P; Clark S; Ireland AJ; Sandy JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P; Yiu C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term effects of fiberotomy on relapse of anterior crowding.
    Taner TU; Haydar B; Kavuklu I; Korkmaz A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 11113795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.
    Valiathan M; Hughes E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):170-7; discussion 177. PubMed ID: 20152670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need.
    Shue-Te Yeh M; Koochek AR; Vlaskalic V; Boyd R; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 11029738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond failure rates for V-loop vs straight wire lingual retainers.
    Lee KD; Mills CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):502-6. PubMed ID: 19361737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjective assessment of dental and psychosocial effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Birkeland K; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 9300838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which way forward? Fixed or removable lower retainers.
    Atack N; Harradine N; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):954-9. PubMed ID: 18004927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
    Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Social perceptions of orthodontic retainer wear.
    Meade MJ; Millett DT; Cronin M
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 36(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 24355869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The reliability of bonded lingual retainers.
    Cerny R
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 17679531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nickel-titanium mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer: for permanent retention and solving relapse of mandibular anterior crowding.
    Liou EJ; Chen LI; Huang CS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 11298318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.