326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21696329)
21. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Binaural benefit for speech recognition with spectral mismatch across ears in simulated electric hearing.
Yoon YS; Liu A; Fu QJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL94-100. PubMed ID: 21877777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):994-1008. PubMed ID: 22894220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.
Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Erenberg SR; Taylor J; Gantz BJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3406-17. PubMed ID: 23145621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Binaural unmasking with multiple adjacent masking electrodes in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3934-45. PubMed ID: 21682415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting the speech reception threshold of cochlear implant listeners using an envelope-correlation based measure.
Yousefian N; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3399-405. PubMed ID: 23145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech recognition outcomes following bilateral cochlear implantation in adults aged over 50 years old.
Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S39-44. PubMed ID: 27049835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1257. PubMed ID: 25190399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.
Stilp CE; Goupell MJ; Kluender KR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL136-41. PubMed ID: 23363194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Voice gender differences and separation of simultaneous talkers in cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Visram AS; Kluk K; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 22894312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear implant simulator with independent representation of the full spiral ganglion.
Grange JA; Culling JF; Harris NSL; Bergfeld S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):EL484. PubMed ID: 29195445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
