235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21697198)
1. Mobility function of a prosthetic knee joint with an automatic stance phase lock.
Andrysek J; Klejman S; Torres-Moreno R; Heim W; Steinnagel B; Glasford S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 21697198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.
Boonstra AM; Schrama J; Fidler V; Eisma WH
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Jun; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 7569824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary evaluation of an automatically stance-phase controlled pediatric prosthetic knee joint using quantitative gait analysis.
Andrysek J; Redekop S; Naumann S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 88(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 17398247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and quantitative evaluation of a stance-phase controlled prosthetic knee joint for children.
Andrysek J; Naumann S; Cleghorn WL
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 16425824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional gait analysis of trans-femoral amputees using two different single-axis prosthetic knees with hydraulic swing-phase control: Kinematic and kinetic comparison of two prosthetic knees.
Sapin E; Goujon H; de Almeida F; Fodé P; Lavaste F
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Jun; 32(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 18569888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D intersegmental knee loading in below-knee amputees across steady-state walking speeds.
Fey NP; Neptune RR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 May; 27(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 22138437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.
Chin T; Maeda Y; Sawamura S; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17979012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 22373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical function, gait, and dynamic balance of transfemoral amputees using two mechanical passive prosthetic knee devices.
Lythgo N; Marmaras B; Connor H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 91(10):1565-70. PubMed ID: 20875515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical evaluation of the automatic stance-phase lock-controlled prosthetic knee joint in young adults with unilateral above-knee amputation.
Andrysek J; Wright FV; Rotter K; Garcia D; Valdebenito R; Mitchell CA; Rozbaczylo C; Cubillos R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 May; 12(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 27376843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of stance control orthoses on gait characteristics and energy expenditure in knee-ankle-foot orthosis users.
Davis PC; Bach TM; Pereira DM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 20470059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical responses of young adults with unilateral transfemoral amputation using two types of mechanical stance control prosthetic knee joints.
Andrysek J; García D; Rozbaczylo C; Alvarez-Mitchell C; Valdebenito R; Rotter K; Wright FV
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):314-322. PubMed ID: 32389076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compensatory mechanism involving the hip joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
Grumillier C; Martinet N; Paysant J; André JM; Beyaert C
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2926-31. PubMed ID: 18771768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of prosthetic ankle mobility in the sagittal plane on the gait of transfemoral amputees wearing a stance phase controlled knee prosthesis.
Lee S; Hong J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Feb; 223(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19278201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary kinematic evaluation of a new stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
Yakimovich T; Lemaire ED; Kofman J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 16949186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
