126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21697906)
1. Supreme Court ruling is good, bad and ugly.
Kysar D
Nature; 2011 Jun; 474(7352):421. PubMed ID: 21697906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Air permit blocks Kansas coal plants.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):953. PubMed ID: 17960195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Climate science. U.S. Supreme Court gets arguments for EPA to regulate CO2.
Kintisch E
Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1375. PubMed ID: 16959983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Climate in court.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7111):486-7. PubMed ID: 17024051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. All the King's men.
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7147):892-3. PubMed ID: 17581547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coming clean on power.
Lancet; 2015 Aug; 386(9994):626. PubMed ID: 26334138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Car emissions are EPA's problem.
Marris E
Nature; 2007 Apr; 446(7136):589. PubMed ID: 17410142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Air quality. Court ruling scrambles clean air plans, leaving a vacuum.
Stokstad E
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):756-7. PubMed ID: 18687928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. States versus gases.
Nature; 2004 Jul; 430(6999):489. PubMed ID: 15282564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bolstering the link.
Nature; 2012 Apr; 484(7392):5. PubMed ID: 22481315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Clean Power Plan. A Public Health Victory Needing Medical Attention.
Ross KR; Rice MB; Takaro TK;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 193(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 26731244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Obama's Clean Power Plan: a breath of fresh air.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Lancet Respir Med; 2015 Sep; 3(9):661. PubMed ID: 26321047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Obama's science legacy: climate (policy) hots up.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7617):387. PubMed ID: 27558047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Global climate change: the Roberts Court and environmental justice.
Gostin LO
Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 17966831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical groups sue EPA over mercury rule.
Kuehn BM
JAMA; 2005 Jul; 294(4):415-6. PubMed ID: 16046636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reporting required? Hospitals and EPA's new greenhouse gas rule.
Wurmbrand MM; Klotz TC
Health Facil Manage; 2010 Apr; 23(4):33-5. PubMed ID: 21513236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Health implications of the West Virginia v Environmental Protection Agency US Supreme Court decision.
Kizer KW; Perera FP; Nadeau KC
Lancet Planet Health; 2022 Nov; 6(11):e847-e848. PubMed ID: 36370720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Database tallies US emissions.
Tollefson J
Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7381):247-8. PubMed ID: 22258582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CO2 in the Supreme Court.
Cooney CM
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1511-2. PubMed ID: 17396633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Directive will unleash new generation of coal polluters.
Avery M; Sauven J; Allot K; Southworth B; Pendleton A
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7184):151. PubMed ID: 18337798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
