173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21698392)
1. Interactive digital slides with heat maps: a novel method to improve the reproducibility of Gleason grading.
Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lockwood G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Schwenkglenks M; Vainer B; Varma M; Verger V; Camparo P
Virchows Arch; 2011 Aug; 459(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 21698392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists.
Egevad L; Ahmad AS; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Griffiths D; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Moss S; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M; Camparo P
Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 23240715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists.
Egevad L; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2005 Jan; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15712175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology.
Latour M; Amin MB; Billis A; Egevad L; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Reuter VE; Sakr WA; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Yang XJ; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1532-9. PubMed ID: 18724248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations.
Zhou M; Li J; Cheng L; Egevad L; Deng FM; Kunju LP; Magi-Galluzzi C; Melamed J; Mehra R; Mendrinos S; Osunkoya AO; Paner G; Shen SS; Tsuzuki T; Trpkov K; Tian W; Yang X; Shah RB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1331-9. PubMed ID: 26099009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current practice in handling and reporting prostate needle biopsies: results of a Turkish survey.
Muezzinoglu B; Yorukoglu K
Pathol Res Pract; 2015 May; 211(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 25701362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.
Kweldam CF; Nieboer D; Algaba F; Amin MB; Berney DM; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Bubendorf L; Cheng L; Compérat E; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Evans AJ; Hansel DE; Humphrey PA; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Tan PH; Varma M; Zhou M; van Leenders GJ
Histopathology; 2016 Sep; 69(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 27028587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays.
Burchardt M; Engers R; Müller M; Burchardt T; Willers R; Epstein JI; Ackermann R; Gabbert HE; de la Taille A; Rubin MA
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2008 Oct; 134(10):1071-8. PubMed ID: 18392850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
