173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21698392)
21. Interobserver reproducibility of percent Gleason grade 4/5 in prostate biopsies.
Glaessgen A; Hamberg H; Pihl CG; Sundelin B; Nilsson B; Egevad L
J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):664-7. PubMed ID: 14713782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.
Zelic R; Giunchi F; Fridfeldt J; Carlsson J; Davidsson S; Lianas L; Mascia C; Zugna D; Molinaro L; Vincent PH; Zanetti G; Andrén O; Richiardi L; Akre O; Fiorentino M; Pettersson A
Clin Epidemiol; 2022; 14():59-70. PubMed ID: 35082531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Multiple prostate cancer cores with different Gleason grades submitted in the same specimen container without specific site designation: should each core be assigned an individual Gleason score?
Kunju LP; Daignault S; Wei JT; Shah RB
Hum Pathol; 2009 Apr; 40(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 19144380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Documentation quality of histopathology reports of prostate needle biopsies: a snapshot].
Biesterfeld S
Urologe A; 2014 Nov; 53(11):1644-50. PubMed ID: 25272987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do adenocarcinomas of the prostate with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 have the potential to metastasize to lymph nodes?
Ross HM; Kryvenko ON; Cowan JE; Simko JP; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1346-52. PubMed ID: 22531173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.
Egevad L; Swanberg D; Delahunt B; Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M; Eklund M
Virchows Arch; 2020 Dec; 477(6):777-786. PubMed ID: 32542445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies.
Melia J; Moseley R; Ball RY; Griffiths DF; Grigor K; Harnden P; Jarmulowicz M; McWilliam LJ; Montironi R; Waller M; Moss S; Parkinson MC
Histopathology; 2006 May; 48(6):644-54. PubMed ID: 16681679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An update of the Gleason grading system.
Epstein JI
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Evidence of the radical prostatectomy Gleason score in the biopsy Gleason score].
Algaba Arrea F; Chivite de León A; Santaularia Segura JM; Oliver Samper A
Actas Urol Esp; 2004 Jan; 28(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 15046476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies.
Sadimin ET; Khani F; Diolombi M; Meliti A; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1686-1692. PubMed ID: 27487740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading.
Kryvenko ON; Williamson SR; Schwartz LE; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2020 Mar; 97():40-51. PubMed ID: 31923450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Helpap B; Egevad L
Virchows Arch; 2006 Dec; 449(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 17091254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interobserver agreement of Gleason score and modified Gleason score in needle biopsy and in surgical specimen of prostate cancer.
Veloso SG; Lima MF; Salles PG; Berenstein CK; Scalon JD; Bambirra EA
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(5):639-46; discussion 647-51. PubMed ID: 17980061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interobserver reproducibility of modified Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Glaessgen A; Hamberg H; Pihl CG; Sundelin B; Nilsson B; Egevad L
Virchows Arch; 2004 Jul; 445(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15156317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate gleason score?
Kunz GM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2003 Sep; 34(9):911-4. PubMed ID: 14562287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
