These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21698588)

  • 1. The Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty--minimum two year clinical and radiological follow-up: an independent single surgeon series.
    Rahman L; Muirhead-Allwood SK
    Hip Int; 2011; 21(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 21698588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up.
    Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinicoradiologic study of the Birmingham Mid-Head Resection device.
    Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; McMinn DJ
    Orthopedics; 2008 Dec; 31(12 Suppl 2):. PubMed ID: 19298020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical study of the Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty: effect of stem size on femoral neck fracture.
    Aghayan S; Shepherd DE; Davis ET
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Aug; 227(8):913-8. PubMed ID: 23636766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A two-year radiostereometric follow-up of the first generation Birmingham mid head resection arthroplasty.
    Itayem R; Arndt A; Daniel J; McMinn DJ; Lundberg A
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 24817401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless metaphyseal fitting anatomic total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients thirty years of age or younger.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):1570-5. PubMed ID: 22992847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early results of the Birmingham mid-head resection arthroplasty.
    Sandiford NA; Muirhead-Allwood S; Skinner J; Kabir C
    Surg Technol Int; 2009 Apr; 18():195-200. PubMed ID: 19579205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and clinical outcomes of preoperative evaluations in modern total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
    Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Sisayanarane T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S120-7. PubMed ID: 20120673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series.
    Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Birmingham Mid-Head Resection hip arthroplasty in a young man with gigantism.
    Murphy MT; Shillington MP; Mogridge DR; Journeaux SF
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):324.e13-6. PubMed ID: 21704481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: two- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):901-9. PubMed ID: 27365467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The outcomes of Cormet hip resurfacing compared to standard primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Costa CR; Johnson AJ; Naziri Q; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 22035478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current status of modern fully porous coated metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gross TP; Liu F
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 23680504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Total hip arthroplasty using a short-stem prosthesis: restoration of hip anatomy.
    Amenabar T; Marimuthu K; Hawdon G; Gildone A; McMahon S
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2015 Apr; 23(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 25920653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
    Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively.
    Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Titanium-titanium modular neck for primary THA. Result of a prospective series of 170 cemented THA with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Ollivier M; Parratte S; Galland A; Lunebourg A; Flecher X; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 25698098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The first 100 fully porous-coated femoral components in hip resurfacing.
    Gross TP; Liu F
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69 Suppl 1():S30-5. PubMed ID: 22035482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.