These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21699810)
1. Reproducibility and agreement of pharyngeal automated impedance manometry with videofluoroscopy. Omari TI; Papathanasopoulos A; Dejaeger E; Wauters L; Scarpellini E; Vos R; Slootmaekers S; Seghers V; Cornelissen L; Goeleven A; Tack J; Rommel N Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Oct; 9(10):862-7. PubMed ID: 21699810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-rater reliability and validity of automated impedance manometry analysis and fluoroscopy in dysphagic patients after head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Szczesniak MM; Maclean J; Zhang T; Liu R; Cock C; Rommel N; Omari TI; Cook IJ Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1183-9. PubMed ID: 26031361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method for the nonradiological assessment of ineffective swallowing. Omari TI; Dejaeger E; Van Beckevoort D; Goeleven A; De Cock P; Hoffman I; Smet MH; Davidson GP; Tack J; Rommel N Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Oct; 106(10):1796-802. PubMed ID: 21556039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method to objectively assess swallow function in adults with suspected aspiration. Omari TI; Dejaeger E; van Beckevoort D; Goeleven A; Davidson GP; Dent J; Tack J; Rommel N Gastroenterology; 2011 May; 140(5):1454-63. PubMed ID: 21354152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An impedance-manometry based method for non-radiological detection of pharyngeal postswallow residue. Omari TI; Dejaeger E; Tack J; Vanbeckevoort D; Rommel N Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Jul; 24(7):e277-84. PubMed ID: 22594606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of bolus volume and viscosity on pharyngeal automated impedance manometry variables derived for broad Dysphagia patients. Omari TI; Dejaeger E; Tack J; Van Beckevoort D; Rommel N Dysphagia; 2013 Jun; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 22986957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective assessment of swallow function in children with suspected aspiration using pharyngeal automated impedance manometry. Rommel N; Selleslagh M; Hoffman I; Smet MH; Davidson G; Tack J; Omari TI J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2014 Jun; 58(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 24552674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of automated and integrated pressure-flow analysis of esophageal pressure-impedance recordings. Rohof WO; Myers JC; Estremera FA; Ferris LS; van de Pol J; Boeckxstaens GE; Omari TI Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Feb; 26(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24164976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraluminal impedance detects failure of pharyngeal bolus clearance during swallowing: a validation study in adults with dysphagia. Szczesniak MM; Rommel N; Dinning PG; Fuentealba SE; Cook IJ; Omari TI Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2009 Mar; 21(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 18761629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Upper esophageal sphincter impedance as a marker of sphincter opening diameter. Omari TI; Ferris L; Dejaeger E; Tack J; Vanbeckevoort D; Rommel N Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2012 May; 302(9):G909-13. PubMed ID: 22323128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective prediction of pharyngeal swallow dysfunction in dysphagia through artificial neural network modeling. Kritas S; Dejaeger E; Tack J; Omari T; Rommel N Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Mar; 28(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 26891061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal criteria for detecting bolus passage across the pharyngo-oesophageal segment during the normal swallow using intraluminal impedance recording. Szczesniak MM; Rommel N; Dinning PG; Fuentealba SE; Cook IJ; Omari TI Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2008 May; 20(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 18179611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of cervical auscultation to detect aspiration in patients with dysphagia. Stroud AE; Lawrie BW; Wiles CM Clin Rehabil; 2002 Sep; 16(6):640-5. PubMed ID: 12392339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities. Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Kelly AM; Drinnan MJ; Leslie P Laryngoscope; 2007 Oct; 117(10):1723-7. PubMed ID: 17906496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated impedance manometry analysis as a method to assess esophageal function. Rommel N; Van Oudenhove L; Tack J; Omari TI Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 May; 26(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 24447538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity? Kelly AM; Leslie P; Beale T; Payten C; Drinnan MJ Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 31(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 17014453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Swallowing Disorders: How We Interpret Pharyngeal Manometry. Cock C; Omari T Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2017 Mar; 19(3):11. PubMed ID: 28289859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]