These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21700054)

  • 1. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.
    Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    Genetics; 2009 May; 182(1):343-53. PubMed ID: 19299339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.
    Sollero BP; Howard JT; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2780-2792. PubMed ID: 31115442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assets of imputation to ultra-high density for productive and functional traits.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; Gianola D; Weigel K; Alenda R; González-Recio O
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6047-58. PubMed ID: 23810591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The feasibility of using low-density marker panels for genotype imputation and genomic prediction of crossbred dairy cattle of East Africa.
    Aliloo H; Mrode R; Okeyo AM; Ni G; Goddard ME; Gibson JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Oct; 101(10):9108-9127. PubMed ID: 30077450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of low-density SNP panels and imputation for cost-effective genomic selection in four aquaculture species.
    Kriaridou C; Tsairidou S; Fraslin C; Gorjanc G; Looseley ME; Johnston IA; Houston RD; Robledo D
    Front Genet; 2023; 14():1194266. PubMed ID: 37252666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
    Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Pryce JE; Arias J; Bowman PJ; Davis SR; Macdonald KA; Waghorn GC; Wales WJ; Williams YJ; Spelman RJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2108-19. PubMed ID: 22459856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short communication: Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction of body conformation traits in Chinese Holsteins using markers derived from high-density marker panels.
    Song H; Li L; Ma P; Zhang S; Su G; Lund MS; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5250-5254. PubMed ID: 29550139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.