459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21700057)
21. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle.
Zhang Z; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5487-94. PubMed ID: 20965364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The value of cows in reference populations for genomic selection of new functional traits.
Buch LH; Kargo M; Berg P; Lassen J; Sørensen AC
Animal; 2012 Jun; 6(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 22558957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increasing imputation and prediction accuracy for Chinese Holsteins using joint Chinese-Nordic reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Ding X; Zhang Q; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Dec; 131(6):462-72. PubMed ID: 25099946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genomic predictions based on a joint reference population for the Nordic Red cattle breeds.
Zhou L; Heringstad B; Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Grove H; Nielsen US; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(7):4485-96. PubMed ID: 24792791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Strategies and utility of imputed SNP genotypes for genomic analysis in dairy cattle.
Khatkar MS; Moser G; Hayes BJ; Raadsma HW
BMC Genomics; 2012 Oct; 13():538. PubMed ID: 23043356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability of genomic evaluations in Holstein-Friesians using haplotypes based on the BovineHD BeadChip.
Schopen GC; Schrooten C
J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7945-51. PubMed ID: 24140319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
