These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Accuracy of stop-cursor method for determining systolic and pulse pressure variation. Tyler L; Greco S; Bridges E; Barnes S; Brown L; Green KG; Wolfson D Am J Crit Care; 2013 Jul; 22(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 23817818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Lansdorp B; Lemson J; van Putten MJ; de Keijzer A; van der Hoeven JG; Pickkers P Br J Anaesth; 2012 Mar; 108(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 22185905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation in horses undergoing general anesthesia. Fielding CL; Stolba DN J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2012 Jun; 22(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 22702443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index. Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measured from a peripheral artery for accurately predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated dogs. Dalmagro TL; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Celeita-Rodríguez N; Garofalo NA; López-Castañeda B; Nascimento-Junior PD Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 48(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 34020897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery. Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients. Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness in dogs receiving goal-directed fluid therapy. Drozdzynska MJ; Chang YM; Stanzani G; Pelligand L Vet Anaesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 29203173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor. Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs. Berkenstadt H; Friedman Z; Preisman S; Keidan I; Livingstone D; Perel A Br J Anaesth; 2005 Jun; 94(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 15769736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients. Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]