These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21702052)

  • 1. Mathematical modeling of variables involved in dissolution testing.
    Gao Z
    J Pharm Sci; 2011 Nov; 100(11):4934-42. PubMed ID: 21702052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The USP Performance Verification Test, Part I: USP Lot P Prednisone Tablets: quality attributes and experimental variables contributing to dissolution variance.
    Deng G; Ashley AJ; Brown WE; Eaton JW; Hauck WW; Kikwai LC; Liddell MR; Manning RG; Munoz JM; Nithyanandan P; Glasgow MJ; Stippler E; Wahab SZ; Williams RL
    Pharm Res; 2008 May; 25(5):1100-9. PubMed ID: 18172581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel off-center paddle impeller (OPI) dissolution testing system for reproducible dissolution testing of solid dosage forms.
    Wang Y; Armenante PM
    J Pharm Sci; 2012 Feb; 101(2):746-60. PubMed ID: 22083630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissolution of prednisone tablets in the presence of an arch-shaped fiber optic probe in a USP dissolution testing apparatus 2.
    Zhang Y; Bredael G; Armenante PM
    J Pharm Sci; 2013 Aug; 102(8):2718-29. PubMed ID: 23861178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies of variability in dissolution testing with USP apparatus 2.
    Gao Z; Moore TW; Smith AP; Doub WH; Westenberger BJ
    J Pharm Sci; 2007 Jul; 96(7):1794-801. PubMed ID: 17252609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vibration effects of lab equipment on dissolution testing with USP paddle method.
    Gao Z; Thies A; Doub W
    J Pharm Sci; 2010 Jan; 99(1):403-12. PubMed ID: 19544371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of dissolution medium agitation on release profiles of sustained-release tablets.
    Paulo ; Sousa Lobo JM
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2001 Sep; 27(8):811-7. PubMed ID: 11699832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of vessel geometric irregularity on dissolution test results.
    Gao Z; Ahadi S; Moore TW; Doub WH; Westenberger BJ; Buhse LF
    J Pharm Sci; 2011 Mar; 100(3):1093-101. PubMed ID: 20803604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cause of high variability in drug dissolution testing and its impact on setting tolerances.
    Qureshi SA; Shabnam J
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2001 Jan; 12(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11113646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the in vivo performance of enteric coated tablets using an in vitro-in silico-in vivo approach: case example diclofenac.
    Kambayashi A; Blume H; Dressman J
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2013 Nov; 85(3 Pt B):1337-47. PubMed ID: 24056057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of vibration and agitation speed on dissolution of USP prednisone tablets RS and various IR tablet formulations.
    Seeger N; Lange S; Klein S
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2015 Aug; 16(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 26104919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibration effects on dissolution tests with USP apparatuses 1 and 2.
    Gao Z; Moore TW; Doub WH
    J Pharm Sci; 2008 Aug; 97(8):3335-43. PubMed ID: 18000813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models.
    Uebbing L; Klumpp L; Webster GK; Löbenberg R
    Drug Des Devel Ther; 2017; 11():1163-1174. PubMed ID: 28442890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles.
    Costa P; Sousa Lobo JM
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2001 May; 13(2):123-33. PubMed ID: 11297896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Typical variability in drug dissolution testing: study with USP and FDA calibrator tablets and a marketed drug (glibenclamide) product.
    Qureshi SA; McGilveray IJ
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 1999 Feb; 7(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 9845813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of deaeration methods on dissolution testing in aqueous media: a study using a total dissolved gas pressure meter.
    Gao Z; Moore TW; Doub WH; Westenberger BJ; Buhse LF
    J Pharm Sci; 2006 Jul; 95(7):1606-13. PubMed ID: 16732563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Medina-López R; Guillén-Moedano S; Hurtado M
    ADMET DMPK; 2020; 8(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 35300193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissolution process analysis using model-free Noyes-Whitney integral equation.
    Hattori Y; Haruna Y; Otsuka M
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2013 Feb; 102():227-31. PubMed ID: 23010115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the use of a 200 ml vessel suitable for dissolution of low dose drug products?
    Crail DJ; Tunis A; Dansereau R
    Int J Pharm; 2004 Jan; 269(1):203-9. PubMed ID: 14698592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of USP apparatus 3 for dissolution testing of immediate-release products.
    Yu LX; Wang JT; Hussain AS
    AAPS PharmSci; 2002; 4(1):E1. PubMed ID: 12049485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.