These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21702332)

  • 1. Modeling the control of attention in visual workspaces.
    Steelman KS; McCarley JS; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 21702332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Great expectations: top-down attention modulates the costs of clutter and eccentricity.
    Steelman KS; McCarley JS; Wickens CD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):403-19. PubMed ID: 24188333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Closed-Loop Model of Operator Visual Attention, Situation Awareness, and Performance Across Automation Mode Transitions.
    Johnson AW; Duda KR; Sheridan TB; Oman CM
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):229-241. PubMed ID: 27591207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pilot's visual attention allocation modeling under fatigue.
    Wu X; Wanyan X; Zhuang D
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23 Suppl 2():S373-81. PubMed ID: 26410504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention.
    Parkhurst D; Law K; Niebur E
    Vision Res; 2002 Jan; 42(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 11804636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mental workload prediction based on attentional resource allocation and information processing.
    Xiao X; Wanyan X; Zhuang D
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S871-9. PubMed ID: 26406085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Uengoer M; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1483-97. PubMed ID: 26338030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology.
    Wickens CD; Goh J; Helleberg J; Horrey WJ; Talleur DA
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):360-80. PubMed ID: 14702989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From shunting inhibition to dynamic normalization: Attentional selection and decision-making in brief visual displays.
    Smith PL; Sewell DK; Lilburn SD
    Vision Res; 2015 Nov; 116(Pt B):219-40. PubMed ID: 25448118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and application of real-time visual attention model for the exploration of 3D virtual environments.
    Hillaire S; Lécuyer A; Regia-Corte T; Cozot R; Royan J; Breton G
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Mar; 18(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 21931178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-task performance consequences of imperfect alerting associated with a cockpit display of traffic information.
    Wickens C; Colcombe A
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):839-50. PubMed ID: 17915602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dynamics of infant visual foraging.
    Robertson SS; Guckenheimer J; Masnick AM; Bacher LF
    Dev Sci; 2004 Apr; 7(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 15320379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of totally and partially predictive alert in distracted and undistracted subjects: An event related potential study.
    Fort A; Collette B; Bueno M; Deleurence P; Bonnard A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():578-86. PubMed ID: 22742776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21208608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.