BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21702580)

  • 1. Exploration of the relationship between topology and designability of conformations.
    Leelananda SP; Towfic F; Jernigan RL; Kloczkowski A
    J Chem Phys; 2011 Jun; 134(23):235101. PubMed ID: 21702580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Designability of Small Proteins from Graph Features of Contact Maps.
    Leelananda SP; Jernigan RL; Kloczkowski A
    J Comput Biol; 2016 May; 23(5):400-11. PubMed ID: 27159634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of machine learning algorithms to classify binary protein sequences as highly-designable or poorly-designable.
    Peto M; Kloczkowski A; Honavar V; Jernigan RL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():487. PubMed ID: 19014713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergence of highly designable protein-backbone conformations in an off-lattice model.
    Miller J; Zeng C; Wingreen NS; Tang C
    Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 12001229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations between designability and various structural characteristics of protein lattice models.
    Yang JY; Yu ZG; Anh V
    J Chem Phys; 2007 May; 126(19):195101. PubMed ID: 17523837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designability of protein structures: a lattice-model study using the Miyazawa-Jernigan matrix.
    Li H; Tang C; Wingreen NS
    Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 12360530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying proteins of high designability via surface-exposure patterns.
    Emberly EG; Miller J; Zeng C; Wingreen NS; Tang C
    Proteins; 2002 May; 47(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 11948783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designable structures are easy to unfold.
    Dias CL; Grant M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Oct; 74(4 Pt 1):042902. PubMed ID: 17155116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designability of lattice model heteropolymers.
    Tiana G; Broglia RA; Provasi D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2001 Jul; 64(1 Pt 1):011904. PubMed ID: 11461285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The designability of protein structures.
    Helling R; Li H; Mélin R; Miller J; Wingreen N; Zeng C; Tang C
    J Mol Graph Model; 2001; 19(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 11381527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding.
    Li H; Helling R; Tang C; Wingreen N
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5275):666-9. PubMed ID: 8662562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein designability analysis in sequence principal component space using 2D lattice model.
    Li ZR; Han X; Liu GR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Oct; 76(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 15313539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Secondary-structure-favored hydrophobic-polar lattice model of protein folding.
    Chen H; Zhou X; Ou-Yang ZC
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2001 Oct; 64(4 Pt 1):041905. PubMed ID: 11690050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers.
    Chan HS; Dill KA
    Proteins; 1996 Mar; 24(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 8778780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric and statistical properties of the mean-field hydrophobic-polar model, the large-small model, and real protein sequences.
    Shih CT; Su ZY; Gwan JF; Hao BL; Hsieh CH; Lo JL; Lee HC
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2002 Apr; 65(4 Pt 1):041923. PubMed ID: 12005889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of alphabet size and foldability requirements on protein structure designability.
    Buchler NE; Goldstein RA
    Proteins; 1999 Jan; 34(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 10336377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designability and cooperative folding in a four-letter hydrophobic-polar model of proteins.
    Liu HG; Tang LH
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Nov; 74(5 Pt 1):051918. PubMed ID: 17279950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural determinant of protein designability.
    England JL; Shakhnovich EI
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 May; 90(21):218101. PubMed ID: 12786593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The distribution of structures in evolving protein populations.
    Taverna DM; Goldstein RA
    Biopolymers; 2000 Jan; 53(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 10644946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unique optimal foldings of proteins on a triangular lattice.
    Li Z; Zhang X; Chen L
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2005; 4(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 16128612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.