These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21702783)

  • 1. Cultural differences in belief bias associated with deductive reasoning?
    Unsworth SJ; Medin DL
    Cogn Sci; 2005 Jul; 29(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 21702783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory, metacognitive uncertainty, and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Quayle JD; Ball LJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1202-23. PubMed ID: 11131820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect.
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):831-63. PubMed ID: 20658855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias.
    Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of activation level on belief bias in relational reasoning.
    Banks AP
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Apr; 37(3):544-77. PubMed ID: 23294043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).
    Klauer KC; Kellen D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 21244192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in structural and functional prefrontal networks during a logical reasoning task.
    Ziaei M; Bonyadi MR; Reutens DC
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2021 Apr; 15(2):1085-1102. PubMed ID: 32556885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability.
    Trippas D; Handley SJ; Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 23565791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The belief bias effect is aptly named: a reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).
    Dube C; Rotello CM; Heit E
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 21244191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of argument structure on judgements of argument strength, function, and adequacy.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Apr; 61(4):641-64. PubMed ID: 18938280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Americans Have a Preference for Rule-Based Classification?
    Murphy GL; Bosch DA; Kim S
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2026-2052. PubMed ID: 28000954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Necessity, possibility and belief: a study of syllogistic reasoning.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Harper CN
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):935-58. PubMed ID: 11548042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity.
    Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.