These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment. Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions? Kerkhofs R; Vonk W; Schriefers H; Chwilla DJ Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study. Beer AL; Röder B Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects. Poirier C; Collignon O; Scheiber C; Renier L; Vanlierde A; Tranduy D; Veraart C; De Volder AG Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):279-85. PubMed ID: 16443376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motion detection and motion verbs: language affects low-level visual perception. Meteyard L; Bahrami B; Vigliocco G Psychol Sci; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1007-13. PubMed ID: 17958716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Soto-Faraco S; Spence C; Kingstone A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):330-45. PubMed ID: 15053692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Top-down and bottom-up contributions to understanding sentences describing objects in motion. Rueschemeyer SA; Glenberg AM; Kaschak MP; Mueller K; Friederici AD Front Psychol; 2010; 1():183. PubMed ID: 21833244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the in-between: multisensory integration of auditory and visual motion streams. Kluss T; Schult N; Schill K; Fahle M; Zetzsche C Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 22353568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral motion produces an auditory after-effect. Shu ZJ; Swindale NV; Cynader MS Nature; 1993 Aug; 364(6439):721-3. PubMed ID: 8355786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Bergen BK; Lindsay S; Matlock T; Narayanan S Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 31(5):733-64. PubMed ID: 21635316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remediation of sentence processing deficits in aphasia using a computer-based microworld. Crerar MA; Ellis AW; Dean EC Brain Lang; 1996 Jan; 52(1):229-75. PubMed ID: 8741982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specific activation of the V5 brain area by auditory motion processing: an fMRI study. Poirier C; Collignon O; Devolder AG; Renier L; Vanlierde A; Tranduy D; Scheiber C Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):650-8. PubMed ID: 16298112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Zwaan RA; Taylor LJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16478313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Capture of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion by moving and static sound. Chen L; Zhou X Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(4):369-89. PubMed ID: 21864460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. Weber K; Indefrey P Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1164-72. PubMed ID: 19328233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Processing of first-order motion in marmoset visual cortex is influenced by second-order motion. Barraclough N; Tinsley C; Webb B; Vincent C; Derrington A Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(5):815-24. PubMed ID: 17020636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]