These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21703078)

  • 1. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
    Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
    Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
    Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
    East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
    Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
    Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
    Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.
    Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E
    SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
    Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.
    Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya G
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 19995507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
    Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
    Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
    Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
    Folkesson UH; Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1999; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
    Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.