73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21703627)
1. Accuracy of generic musculoskeletal models in predicting the functional roles of muscles in human gait.
Correa TA; Baker R; Graham HK; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2011 Jul; 44(11):2096-105. PubMed ID: 21703627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?
Valente G; Pitto L; Testi D; Seth A; Delp SL; Stagni R; Viceconti M; Taddei F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112625. PubMed ID: 25390896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of model geometry and joint center locations on inverse kinematic/dynamic predictions: A comparative study of sexually dimorphic models.
Dranetz J; Chen S; Choi H
J Biomech; 2024 May; 169():112147. PubMed ID: 38768542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiment-guided tuning of muscle-tendon parameters to estimate muscle fiber lengths and passive forces.
Luis I; Afschrift M; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14652. PubMed ID: 38918538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the high-dimensional structure of muscle redundancy via subject-specific and generic musculoskeletal models.
Valero-Cuevas FJ; Cohn BA; Yngvason HF; Lawrence EL
J Biomech; 2015 Aug; 48(11):2887-96. PubMed ID: 25980557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psoas force recruitment in full-body musculoskeletal movement simulations is restored with a geometrically informed cost function weighting.
Sturdy JT; Sessoms PH; Silverman AK
J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112130. PubMed ID: 38713998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra and inter-rater variability in the construction of patient-specific musculoskeletal model.
Votava J; Kratochvíl A; Daniel M
Gait Posture; 2024 Feb; 108():195-198. PubMed ID: 38103325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flat and bouncy walking.
Alexander RM
J Physiol; 2007 Jul; 582(Pt 2):474. PubMed ID: 17510174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contributing Components of Metabolic Energy Models to Metabolic Cost Estimations in Gait.
Gambietz M; Nitschke M; Miehling J; Koelewijn AD
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Apr; 71(4):1228-1236. PubMed ID: 37938950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictions of thumb, hand, and arm muscle parameters derived using force measurements of varying complexity and neural networks.
Lindbeck EM; Diaz MT; Nichols JA; Harley JB
J Biomech; 2023 Dec; 161():111834. PubMed ID: 37865980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AST: An OpenSim-based tool for the automatic scaling of generic musculoskeletal models.
Di Pietro A; Bersani A; Curreli C; Di Puccio F
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 175():108524. PubMed ID: 38688126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.
Hicks JL; Uchida TK; Seth A; Rajagopal A; Delp SL
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Feb; 137(2):020905. PubMed ID: 25474098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discovering individual-specific gait signatures from data-driven models of neuromechanical dynamics.
Winner TS; Rosenberg MC; Jain K; Kesar TM; Ting LH; Berman GJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1011556. PubMed ID: 37889927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EMG-Driven Musculoskeletal Model Calibration With Wrapping Surface Personalization.
Ao D; Li G; Shourijeh MS; Patten C; Fregly BJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():4235-4244. PubMed ID: 37831559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An EMG-to-Force Processing Approach to Estimating Knee Muscle Forces during Adult, Self-Selected Speed Gait.
Bogey R
Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 37627865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EMG Validation of a Subject-Specific Thoracolumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model During Dynamic Activities in Older Adults.
Alemi MM; Banks JJ; Lynch AC; Allaire BT; Bouxsein ML; Anderson DE
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Oct; 51(10):2313-2322. PubMed ID: 37353715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring fascicle lengths of extrinsic and intrinsic thumb muscles using extended field-of-view ultrasound.
Rakauskas TR; Barron SM; Ordonez Diaz T; Nichols JA
J Biomech; 2023 Mar; 149():111512. PubMed ID: 36842405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of kinematic parameters of children gait obtained by inverse and direct models.
Ziziene J; Daunoraviciene K; Juskeniene G; Raistenskis J
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270423. PubMed ID: 35749351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological variation in paediatric lower limb bones.
Carman L; Besier TF; Choisne J
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):3251. PubMed ID: 35228607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling worth the extra effort or is generic modelling worth the shortcut?
Akhundov R; Saxby DJ; Diamond LE; Edwards S; Clausen P; Dooley K; Blyton S; Snodgrass SJ
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262936. PubMed ID: 35077508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
