196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21703637)
1. Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves.
Doenst T; Amorim PA; Al-Alam N; Lehmann S; Mukherjee C; Faerber G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 142(5):1180-7. PubMed ID: 21703637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel thoughts on patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: the rationale for the PAR I trial.
Doenst T; Amorim PA; Diab M; Hagendorff A; Faerber G; Graff J; Rastan A; Deutsch O; Eichinger W;
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 62(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 25136945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodynamics of Pericardial Aortic Valves: Contemporary Stented versus Stentless Valves in a Matched Comparison.
Christ T; Holinski S; Zhigalov K; Zielinski CB; Grubitzsch H
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Dec; 23(6):298-303. PubMed ID: 28890465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement?
Spiliotopoulos K; Armstrong S; Maganti M; David TE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S74-7. PubMed ID: 22104672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic performance evaluation of small aortic ATS Medical valves by Doppler echocardiography.
Kirzner CF; Vinals B; Moya J; Puente JG; Rabago R; Artiz V; Martinelli J; Fraile-Chief J
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Nov; 6(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 9427139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pericardial stentless aortic valves: effects of sizing on hemodynamics and root geometry.
Jin XY; Westaby S
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):55-9. PubMed ID: 11805950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sizing strategy is a major determinant of postoperative pressure gradients in commonly implanted stented tissue valves.
Diab M; Faerber G; Bothe W; Lemke S; Breuer M; Walther M; Doenst T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 44(4):e289-94. PubMed ID: 23904132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic performance and clinical consequences of aortic valve replacement with 21-mm sized pericardial bioprostheses.
Boeken U; Litmathe J; Kurt M; Feindt P; Gams E
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 16208613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-prosthesis mismatch and left ventricular remodelling after implantation of Shelhigh SuperStentless aortic valve prostheses.
Germing A; Lindstaedt M; Holt S; Reber D; Mügge A; Laczkovics A; Fritz M
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Aug; 49(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 18665119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Epic Supra aortic stented valve.
Maitland A; Hirsch GM; Pascoe EA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 21714425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mid-term follow up of a novel bioprosthesis in aortic valve surgery.
Doss M; Sirat S; Kiessling AH; Jaenicke S; Moritz A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 23409357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and hemodynamic implications of supra-annular implant of biological aortic valves.
Badano LP; Zamorano JL; Pavoni D; Tosoratti E; Baldassi M; Zakja E; Gianfagna P; Fioretti PM; Livi U
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2006 Jul; 7(7):524-32. PubMed ID: 16801814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic performance of mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis - optimizing management for the small aortic annulus.
Jamieson WR; Forgie WR; Hayden RI; Langlois Y; Ling H; Stanford EA; Roberts KA; Dolman WB
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 58(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 20333567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes.
Chacko SJ; Ansari AH; McCarthy PM; Malaisrie SC; Andrei AC; Li Z; Lee R; McGee E; Bonow RO; Puthumana JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 23926194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement on short-term survival: a retrospective single center analysis of 632 consecutive patients with isolated stented biological aortic valve replacement.
Hoffmann G; Ogbamicael SA; Jochens A; Frank D; Lutter G; Cremer J; Petzina R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 62(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 24554597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do differences in early hemodynamic performance of current generation biologic aortic valves predict outcomes 1 year following surgery?
Thalji NM; Suri RM; Michelena HI; Greason KL; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Burkhart HM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):163-73.e2. PubMed ID: 25439772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
