These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21704374)
21. An Integrated Approach for the Environmental Characterization of a Wide Potentially Contaminated Area in Southern Italy. Ducci D; Albanese S; Boccia L; Celentano E; Cervelli E; Corniello A; Crispo A; De Vivo B; Iodice P; Langella C; Lima A; Manno M; Palladino M; Pindozzi S; Rigillo M; Romano N; Sellerino M; Senatore A; Speranza G; Fiorentino N; Fagnano M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 28654005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities. Soutter M; Alexandrescu M; Schenk C; Drobot R Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Aug; 16 Suppl 1():S33-41. PubMed ID: 18998185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Probe into the method of regional ecological risk assessment-a case study of wetland in the Yellow River Delta in China. Xu X; Lin H; Fu Z J Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 70(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 15036697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incorporating linguistic, probabilistic, and possibilistic information in a risk-based approach for ranking contaminated sites. Zhang K; Achari G; Pei Y Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):711-24. PubMed ID: 20872650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ecotoxicological and environmental problems associated with the former chemical plant in Tarnowskie Gory, Poland. Malina G Toxicology; 2004 Dec; 205(3):157-72. PubMed ID: 15464626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Application of receptor-specific risk distribution in the arsenic contaminated land management. Chen IC; Ng S; Wang GS; Ma HW J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():1080-90. PubMed ID: 22884730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multi-attribute methodology for the prioritisation of oil contaminated sites in the Niger Delta. Sam K; Coulon F; Prpich G Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 579():1323-1332. PubMed ID: 27916308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites. Critto A; Cantarella L; Carlon C; Giove S; Petruzzelli G; Marcomini A Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jul; 2(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 16869441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The importance of time of exposure to harmful anthropogenic factors as an element of cancer risk assessment in children. Absalon D; Ślesak B Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2011 May; 74(4):967-73. PubMed ID: 21334746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Toward a conceptual approach for assessing risks from chemical mixtures and other stressors to coastal ecosystem services. Syberg K; Backhaus T; Banta G; Bruce P; Gustavsson M; Munns WR; Rämö R; Selck H; Gunnarsson JS Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):376-386. PubMed ID: 27662428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integration of soil magnetometry and geochemistry for assessment of human health risk from metallurgical slag dumps. Rachwał M; Wawer M; Magiera T; Steinnes E Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Dec; 24(34):26410-26423. PubMed ID: 28948429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Initial screening of contaminated land: a comparison of US and Swedish methods. Bergius K; Oberg T Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 39(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 17122997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Beyond contaminated land assessment: on costs and benefits of bioaccessibility prediction. Latawiec AE; Reid BJ Environ Int; 2009 Aug; 35(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 19403173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Integrated approach of environmental impact and risk assessment of Rosia Montana Mining Area, Romania. Stefănescu L; Robu BM; Ozunu A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Nov; 20(11):7719-27. PubMed ID: 23381801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Wildlife vulnerability and risk maps for combined pollutants. Lahr J; Münier B; De Lange HJ; Faber JF; Sørensen PB Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3891-8. PubMed ID: 20060570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Chemical analysis, distributed modelling and risk indices. Three fundamental pillars in Risk Assessment. Benfenati E; Genah D; Verro R; Mazzatorta P ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2():1617-25. PubMed ID: 12806149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel methods for integrated risk assessment of cumulative stressors--results from the NoMiracle project. Løkke H Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20580411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of a spatial stochastic multimedia exposure model to assess population exposure at a regional scale. Caudeville J; Bonnard R; Boudet C; Denys S; Govaert G; Cicolella A Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 432():297-308. PubMed ID: 22750175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatially explicit multimedia fate models for pollutants in Europe: state of the art and perspectives. Pistocchi A; Sarigiannis DA; Vizcaino P Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3817-30. PubMed ID: 20089295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]